News: Brokerage

New New York City transfer tax return requirement - by Tom Kearns

Tom Kearns, Olshan Frome Wolosky Tom Kearns, Olshan Frome Wolosky
New York City’s Department of Finance recently issued a cryptic notice informing the real estate community that the city’s Real Property Tax (RPT) Return must now include the identity and social security numbers (or federal tax id numbers) for every member of an entity (typically a limited liability company) that is a seller or purchaser of real property located in the city. Previously, not every member of the LLC would need to be disclosed in the RPT Return. Curiously, the requirement only reaches the members in the top tier entity. Today’s larger and middle market commercial real estate deals, however, almost always have multiple tiers of LLCs, which give flexibility in management and financing. The new rules do not reach the lower tier entities. So, for example, if “Purchaser LLC” is 100% owned by “Investor LLC,” it is sufficient to simply list Investor LLC as the sole member and include only the Investor LLC’s tax id number. The new rule causes various concerns: Why is the new rule necessary?  Full member information is already required on income tax returns. Although the member roster and tax id numbers are disclosed on the RPT Return, that information is not made publicly available on the ACRIS database. RPT Returns are, however, always part of the closing documents for a transaction and are available for inspection by the other party and title company personnel. Concerns about identity theft have been raised. With numerous copies, PDFs and emails containing the RPT Return, the risk of theft increases dramatically. For smaller matters, the addition of multiple tiers of LLCs to protect against these risks increases the cost of doing business in New York City without any appreciable benefit to the city. Once again it seems, larger deals with sophisticated lawyers will be able to minimize the risks but the average business person may be in for a nasty surprise. Often the person behind an assemblage of multiple properties may want to disguise his or her identity. Careful planning will be necessary. The new rules came into effect for transactions closing after May 18. If a buyer or seller had structured its ownership before the new rule came into effect, the LLC ownership structure would need to be amended in order to minimize the risks. For persons who wish to conceal their identity to avoid fans (like sports stars) or kidnappers (like foreigners investing from troubled countries), minimizing the risk of having their identity revealed to others on a haphazard closing table will result in additional costs. What about a common situation where the investor roll is not yet set at the closing table but is clarified within a few days? Will there be penalties assessed in that situation? Perhaps these concerns will be addressed or perhaps the city will see the error of its ways in collecting duplicative identifying information.  But in the meantime, purchasers and sellers of New York City real estate should be forewarned. Tom Kearns is a partner at Olshan Frome Wolosky, New York, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,