Goldschmidt of Goldschmidt & Associates brokers sale of former DiCicco Market
Eric Goldschmidt, senior partner at Scarsdale-based Goldschmidt & Associates has brokered the sale of the former DiCicco Marketplace property, 505 New Rochelle Rd., Bronxville to CVS Caremark Corp.
The former food market will be renovated and occupied by a 7,800 s/f CVS Pharmacy.
The new CVS location is located between its Eastchester and Pelham stores.
The store opening, in early 2014, complements the opening in mid-November of the 14,400 s/f CVS Pharmacy at 2290 Central Park Ave., Yonkers, the former site of Nathan's. CVS will occupy 50% of the new strip center. Goldschmidt & Associates is the exclusive broker for the center and was the sole broker for the CVS Caremark lease.
T.M. Crowley & Associates was the preferred developer for CVS/Caremark on both transactions.
When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:
Formal Legislative Role
• Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.