News: Brokerage

LLC agreement issues for co-investors - by Thomas Kearns

Limited liability companies or “LLCs” are used to hold the vast majority of U.S. real estate investments. Outside of REITs and other corporate owned real estate, investments of any significant size typically include a large institutional capital partner and a more entrepreneurial operating partner (or, in the language of LLCs, “member”) with each contributing a share of the equity required for the deal. Operating members often offer a portion of their investment to permit small investments to be made by friendly co-investors. Sometimes that invitation is done as a favor, i.e., to reward an investor’s loyalty on other deals or to return a favor granted by the investor, and sometimes because the operating member needs the money in order to meet the requirements of the institutional investor. 

When the invitation to a smaller investor arrives it can be accompanied by a “we’re in a hurry” message with the clear implication that the co-investor won’t be able to negotiate the terms of the agreement governing the LLC. So what should such smaller investors and their lawyers look for in the draft LLC agreement? And what should the operating member instruct its lawyer to include in the agreement so that the small investors are comfortable with the terms of the investment? This column mentions a few and assumes the small investor has no or minimal negotiating leverage. 

Perhaps the primary issue to review is whether the operating member has disclaimed fiduciary duty. A disclaimer can be made in Delaware LLCs but not New York LLCs since New York does not permit a broad disclaimer. An operating member should think twice before including a broad disclaimer in the proposed Delaware LLC agreement given to investors because of the negative impression it will give small investors. With a fiduciary duty standard, the investor can at least feel that he or she will be treated fairly. Without it, all bets are off. 

Next, small investors typically invest because they trust the operating member. If the proposed LLC agreement permits the operating member to transfer all of its interest in the LLC to a third party without the consent of the small investors, the small investors could be stuck with an illiquid investment in an entity managed by a stranger. The easy solution is a “tag-along” clause which lets the small investor sell its interest to the same third party at the same price. While a tag-along clause is a mild drag on the marketability of the operating member’s interest, most agree that it’s only fair to permit the small investor to tag-along on the sale. The clause typically doesn’t apply to transfers by the operating member to affiliates or to partial sales. 

Finally, since most small investors are individuals, the right of the small investor to transfer his or her interest for estate planning purposes and on death or disability is key. Failure to include commonly used permitted transfer provisions could lead to a default, a heavily discounted forced sale, or even forfeiture of the interest depending on the terms of the LLC agreement.

In short, small investors should look for, and operating members should consider including in the first draft, a few key protections for the smaller investors to give them comfort that they will be treated fairly.

Thomas Kearns is a partner with Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP’s real estate department, New York, N.Y.

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking