News: Brokerage

Law: Owners beware: Payment bonds must be filed with county clerk - by Joseph Asselta

Either at its own election, or because a construction lender requires it, many owners of construction projects require their general contractor to issue a labor and material payment bond, which essentially serves to guarantee prompt payment to those who supply labor, material and equipment to the project. But the mere tendering to the owner by the contractor of the original payment bond from the surety is not enough. That bond must also be publicly filed.

Parties involved with construction projects in New York should be aware of an often overlooked provision in the New York General Obligations Law, namely §5-322.3, which provides as follows:

“A copy of any payment bond executed in connection with a contract for the improvement of real property other than a contract for a public improvement, shall be filed within thirty days of such execution by the owner of the improvement in the office of the county clerk in the county in which the improvement is to be undertaken…. Any owner failing to file such payment bond as provided herein shall be liable for the reasonable attorney’s fees, as determined by the court, of any claimant successfully bringing an action or proceeding on the bond.”

Thus, an owner of a project in New York City is required to file a copy of any payment bond executed in connection with a construction contract within thirty days in the office of the appropriate county clerk. In the author’s experience, however, this is rarely done. However, where an owner fails to file a copy of the bond executed in connection with the contract, an unpaid subcontractor or supplier on the project may hold the owner liable for the reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in a successful nonpayment action on the bond.

Joseph Asselta is a partner and chair of the Construction Law practice group of Forchelli Deegan Terrana LLP, Uniondale, N.Y.

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking