News: Spotlight Content

Without traditional restrictions, private lenders can be creative in their financing

With every decision in life there are pros and cons. The decision of what the best avenue to take when financing a commercial real estate transaction cannot be taken lightly. Exploring different options are crucial to reap the benefits of your asset. There are few options to finance commercial real estate, today. The traditional way of financing is to obtain a mortgage through a bank, a life insurance company or a government backed agency. In the current state of the real estate market, financing through this means has been increasingly difficult to obtain. The traditional lenders that make loans are the balance sheet lenders, who hold their loans in their portfolio and have a limited amount of liquidity to put out each year. The secondary market has been non-existent since the sub prime fallout, which has sent investors looking for other means of financing. Several private lenders such as hedge funds and private investors have come into the market with fresh capital. There are many advantages and disadvantages to obtaining financing through private and traditional financing. An advantage to obtaining private financing is the ability to close quickly. Financing through traditional means may require a committee approval as well as appraisals and environmental reports which may take several weeks to produce. Most private lenders order appraisals through the same parties that the banks order through, but pay a higher premium at the borrower's expense for turnaround time of approximately 3 days. Furthermore, to speed up the process, the private lender may do an Environmental Transaction Screen rather than a full Phase 1 report. Once, the borrower and lender have agreed to terms, and third party reports are in, the lender's council and the borrower's attorney would start on the legal work. The entire loan process can be completed within a few days. Another advantage of private financing is the ability of the private lender to think "outside the box." Traditional lenders are cash-flow lenders and base their loans on the Debt Service Coverage Ratios which is typically around 1.20 - 1.35 depending the property type. In many cases, seasoned investors purchase properties that have a below market rental income average, and are buying the property for the upside potential to add value. These properties are usually mismanaged and more often than not need capital improvements and rehab work. A traditional lender would not be able to give the investor enough financing because the building could only support so much in annual debt service. As a result of the building being previously mismanaged, some work would need to be done so the lender may do some type of holdback or escrow thus holding back even more funds. Private lenders can creatively work through these issues and see the true value of the building and its potential and possibly offer more financing. Private lenders can be as creative as they want because they don't have the regulations or limits of what a typical bank may have. The disadvantage of private financing is the cost. Private financing is usually a last resort to a borrower, because of its costs. It is the investor's last chance of getting financed. The appraisal costs are usually double what it normally costs because of the time issue, and the same with the environmental. The lender charges a higher interest rate of about 12 - 17% and also charges loan fees, which typically range from 2 - 6% of the total loan amount. The legal fees are typically more expensive, because the documents may change from deal to deal and the time frame may be very short. Based on the information presented it is clear that in certain situations private financing is the best way to go if your transaction needs to be closed quickly and if your building does not fit in the box for a traditional mortgage. Choosing the right private lender that understands what it will take to get your asset into conventional financing at the end of the day is another important decision to make and should not be taken lightly. At JG Capital LLC, we provide short term bridge financing for all commercial property types. Jason Au is a managing member at JG Capital, LLC, New York, N.Y.
MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability