News: Brokerage

Why filing a Real Property Income & Expense (RPIE) is essential for NYC property owners - by Peter Blond

Peter Blond, <a class=Brandt, Steinberg, Lewis & Blond LLP" width="200" height="275" /> Peter Blond, Brandt,
Steinberg, Lewis
& Blond LLP

Even in 2017, there are still too many New York City property owners that believe their real estate tax assessment duties conclude with the passing of the March NYC tax commission deadlines. In actuality, spring brings real estate tax assessment responsibilities via the legally mandatory RPIE filing due June 1st.  According to the NYC Department of Finance, over 15,000 lots city-wide were initially deemed non-compliant for last year’s RPIE-2015. The RPIE (Real Property Income & Expense) is essential because NYC utilizes an income and expense approach to value to determine your assessment each year. 

Ironically, while owners of income producing properties must provide their annual figures, the city is under no reciprocal obligation to use the data in whole or part. Nonetheless, miss that June 1st deadline and the city has been unforgiving when it comes to issuing fines to those deemed non-compliant.  While the $300 fine for the lowest of assessments is relatively meager, there are many ordinary properties which are fined a minimum of $5,000 for their non-compliance.

Indeed, one of the cruelest situations I know of involved a property which simply failed to click the “sign & submit” button after entering all of the information. As the city warns, “If you do not complete this step, you will not be in compliance with the RPIE filing requirement.” The property was in the highest penalty class (assessments of $25 million or higher) resulting in a $100,000 fine even though all of the data was stored on the city’s server. 

Property owners should understand they will lose the right to a hearing at the New York City tax commission, the following year, if they are deemed RPIE non-compliant. Even so, that does not invalidate their protest.  In years past the City Department of Finance has applied the most unfavorable permutations when estimating income, expenses and cap rates for non-compliant properties.  Most attorneys urge filing a protest in any year, but especially following non-compliance to make certain the city’s imputed income is fair. 

The RPIE’s vacancy section is another requirement that is potentially harmful to owners.  By potentially basing the entire vacancy section on occupancy as of January 5th (the taxable status date in NYC) rather than the full year, the city’s valuation model may utilize income that is artificially high. For example, if the property was occupied for most of 2016 but you lose an anchor tenant effective January 6th, 2017, the city’s projection may include a gross income increase – rather than a decline – because the vacancy period is uncertain. This example could result in a substantial over-assessment at a time when gross income is plummeting.

A common error by owners is failing to segregate rent paid between related parties.  By not clearly indicating the source of rental income, even at market rates, it could cause an inappropriate assessment increase as the city will ascribe rental value for any space it deems owner occupied.  Accordingly, if you lump related rent with unrelated rent, the city will double count rent for the same space.

A more recent mistake is filing the standard form RPIE if you own a hotel, adult care/nursing home, gas station, car wash, oil change facility, self-storage facility, theatre or concert hall (each of these specialty properties has its own RPIE form). The city has been increasing the level of detail required for these types of property.  Essentially, the city is using business income and expenses to determine the assessments.  As more owners create related triple net leases to obscure the business income and expenses, these requirements are becoming more rigid. 

While we have focused on properties required to file the full RPIE, many owners incorrectly assume a past exemption from the full filing equals no current responsibility to update the city’s information.   This belief is pure fallacy.  In fairness to the city, use and occupancy changes all of the time.  Accordingly, even if you are exempt under one of the eleven RPIE exclusions, you must still file by indicating which one applies to the subject property or you will be fined (albeit a relatively small amount if indeed exempt).

In the end, if you have any doubt, file.  If you have any questions you should contact your tax certiorari counsel, or accountant, to determine what if anything is required.  Remember, filings should be on-line only at nyc.gov/rpie. Lastly, if you filed income and expenses with the tax commission earlier this year, please keep in mind that the RPIE data should match.  If an error was detected, subsequent to filing with the tax commission, an amended income and expense report should be submitted as promptly as possible through your tax certiorari attorney.

Peter Blond, Esq. is a partner at Brandt, Steinberg, Lewis & Blond LLP and the chair of the NYC Bar committee on condemnation & tax certiorari, New York, N.Y.

MORE FROM Brokerage

NYSCAR June 2026 president’s message - by Mercedes Brien

As I write this letter, we are preparing to be at the Annual Conference being held at the Rivers Casino, Schenectady, New York. I look forward to reporting on the conference in my next letter. We have some great courses coming up via Zoom. Please be sure to keep watch on upcoming courses by visiting nyscar.org/resources and tools/professional development.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced