News: Brokerage

Tips on making your property taxes less taxing by Wakeman and Wassel

Robert Wakeman, Cullen and Dykman LLP Robert Wakeman, Cullen and Dykman LLP
Thomas Wassel, Cullen and Dykman LLP Thomas Wassel, Cullen and Dykman LLP

All business owners know that whether they own their property or lease it, property taxes make up a significant portion of their expenses. Many do not realize that there is a process by which they can try to reduce their property taxes and obtain substantial savings.

Most real property is subject to taxation in New York State. Generally, the taxes are set by the town or city where the property is located. If the property is located in an incorporated village, that village may separately set the taxes for the property. The amount of taxes paid is based on the “assessment” of the property set by local officials, who attempt to determine the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the property by various methods. For most commercial property, this involves determining the actual or expected income and expenses for the property and performing various technical analyses to determine what a reasonable investor would pay for the property based on the expected rate of return. If it is determined that the assessed FMV of the property is higher than what the property is actually worth, the property owner may be entitled to refunds or a reduced FMV (and lower taxes) in future years.

There are many reasons why the assessment may be too high. Assessments may be unchanged for many years, and may not reflect current market conditions. An assessor may use the sales price of property to set an assessment, but this can be incorrect if the sales price reflects other assets in addition to the land and building, such as the “good will” of the business. This is particularly a problem in assessing hotels and motels, where items such as furniture, fixtures and equipment are often assessed improperly. If a property is in poor condition or has suffered from one of the numerous recent storms, the assessment may not reflect this. There are many other possible reasons—now is the time to ensure that the assessment is set correctly!

The next set of filings in the Capital District area are generally due by May 28. A “tentative” assessment for every property will be made public on May 1. A property owner can file a “grievance” with the town or city assessor challenging this tentative assessment. Failure to properly file a grievance by the deadline will prevent assessment review this year. In filing a grievance, the property owner should submit evidence to help persuade the assessor to lower the assessment and can attend a hearing to state the case. There is no governmental charge to file a grievance. The assessor will make a decision on or before July 1, when a “final” assessment will be published. If the property owner isn’t happy with that final assessment, a court proceeding can be started. The deadline for such a “tax certiorari” proceeding is July 31. There is a filing fee imposed by the court of $210. Each year’s assessment in each jurisdiction is a separate cause of action, and requires a separate filing. A filing in 2017 is a challenge to the assessment which will be used in 2017-18—it doesn’t affect assessments from earlier years, and doesn’t preserve a challenge to later years.

Here’s some good news: the worst that can happen if you file a grievance or start a proceeding is that the assessment stays where it is. The assessment can only be reduced by a court—it can’t be increased.

You owe it to yourself to have your assessment reviewed. Your bottom line may thank you.

Robert Wakeman and Thomas Wassel are members of Cullen and Dykman LLP, Albany, N.Y.

MORE FROM Brokerage

AmTrustRE secures 5,754 s/f lease with GKV Architects at 360 Lexington Avenue

Manhattan, NY AmTrustRE has executed a 5,754 s/f lease at its premier boutique Midtown East office tower, 360 Lexington Ave., with longtime partner GKV Architects. The award-winning firm will occupy a portion of the 14th floor. >“GKV Architects has been a trusted partner to AmTrustRE for over two decades, playing an integral role in shaping and elevating several
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.