News: Brokerage

The future of the section 1031 exchange community: Will it survive 2017? - by Michael Packman

Micahel Packman, KNPRE

While the entire country is waiting to see the impact of last year’s political changes, the 1031 exchange community is probably at the forefront.  The roller coaster ride of last year ending with the election of Donald Trump as our new president has put the country in a position for the potential of major economic changes.  The Republicans maintaining a majority in both the House and Senate, combined with Trump in the White House has opened the door for huge tax reform.

The Republican sponsored blueprint for tax reform is expected to bring tax breaks to the entire county, including some major advantages for businesses.  However, one area that it is suspiciously silent on is the almost 100-year-old section 1031 of the tax code.  This has created a large amount of speculation and fear in the industry as to whether the deferral will survive this year’s budget. President Obama’s 2017 budget proposal ignited the fire since disclosed last year. It has excluded arts and collectables from the exemption and has limited all included real and personal property to a maximum of $1 million annually.  During last year’s campaign, there were many questions surrounding Mr. Trump’s massive tax write-offs. The fact that he is in the real estate business has led to scrutiny of all real estate related deductions, including section 1031.  It has been termed a loophole used by wealthy developers to never pay taxes.  The sad part about this is that developers can’t even use 1031 exchanges to defer their profits when selling a project as the they are treated as business income, not investment gain.  Another interesting fact is that 1031 exchanges defer, not eliminate the tax and 88% of properties acquired in an exchange eventually are disposed of in a taxable sale.

The huge tax cuts included in the Blueprint coupled with the silence on exchanges have caused the 1031 industry to be fearful that buried in the reform will be a repeal of section 1031.  While 1031 exchanges actually compliment the Blueprint, by adding to growth, the fear is that they will be sacrificed in favor of some of the more recognizable reforms included in the proposal. This could end up being a huge mistake and one that potentially leads to the unintended consequence of a downward spiral for an already fragile U.S. economy.  Multiple studies have been done on the effects of a repeal of the section, including one by Ernst & Young.  The conclusions are all in agreement; a devastating impact on the overall economy. According to some of the 1031 industry’s leaders, many in Washington don’t realize the extent of the benefits Section 1031 extends to the economy and the consequences to be had should it be repealed. If we look back to 1986, a similar sacrifice was made.  At the time, passive losses were allowed to be taken in real estate. The major tax reform of that year repealed the ability to use write off the losses resulting in almost immediate real estate downturn, and the crash of the savings and loan industry which brought on the recession of the 1990’s.  The scary part is that Section 1031 is more impactful on the economy that passive losses were.

The one thing for certain regarding Section 1031 is the uncertainty currently surrounding it. Will Mr. Trump, being in the real estate business and understanding it’s value, never let 1031 be deposed of? Does the combined Republican control sacrifice exchanges in favor of more visible tax incentives? Or do they see the value of keeping section 1031 and the potential downtown should they go away? As with everything in life, nothing is for certain until the paper is signed. Fortunately, organizations like the Federation of Exchange Accommodators (FEA) are working diligently to keep the Section alive. They have a dedicated website, 1031taxreform.com. This site is a true resource to help understand the benefits of exchanges and includes actions that anyone can take to help the cause, including sending a letter to a local congressman.

Michael Packman and Brian Sidman are co-founders & principals of KNPRE, Westbury, N.Y.

MORE FROM Brokerage

NYSCAR June 2026 president’s message - by Mercedes Brien

As I write this letter, we are preparing to be at the Annual Conference being held at the Rivers Casino, Schenectady, New York. I look forward to reporting on the conference in my next letter. We have some great courses coming up via Zoom. Please be sure to keep watch on upcoming courses by visiting nyscar.org/resources and tools/professional development.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced