News: Brokerage

The case for asking prices; Increase accountability

At Agorafy we have made the case since day one that requiring verified asking prices for all of our listings increases transparency and accountability in the market place. We also believe it helps to create a more efficient market by educating principals and clients alike, which leads to more informed conversations, and saves agents and their client's time confirming availability and pricing. Access to market pricing is a necessity to all market participants, and one of our goals is to make it widely available. Those looking for a new home for their family or business need to be able to research and compare prices across different buildings and neighborhoods. Real estate agents need to price out new vacancies and potential exclusives as negotiated the best deal for their client. Investors need to spot shifting trends and be able to properly underwrite potential deals. Having access to data on recent transactions for comparables helps to give a partial picture of the current market environment. However when pricing a potential exclusive or underwriting an asset it's not enough to know where prices have been, you need to forecast where they are going. This is the case for asking prices. There are many positive aspects to relying on asking prices when determining market pricing. Not only do they give a starting point for negotiation and establish and expectation between the parties, but they are also a forward looking assumption on what the market can bear. By focusing on shifting asking prices, real estate professionals gain enormous insights into pricing trends. Since they are forward looking by nature, active listings are sensitive to supply and demand and are more responsive to the market. This feed back in real time can be much more valuable than recent taking rents or closing prices, which degrade in relevance as time goes on. It is true that asking prices can be inflated by misinformed real estate agents or unrealistic sellers and landlords. However, mispriced listings typically stand out as outliers and get corrected through market feedback. The majority of the time the taking rent or closing price is a small percentage below the asking price. However during periods of short supply, deals get done quickly above the starting price, and subsequent asking prices get revised upwards. Most real estate professionals can use their experience to forecast where the deal will get done in relation to the asking price and can spot changes in pricing by monitoring the spread between asking prices and the taking rent or closing price. Taking rents as a comparable provide a nice clean data point which can be used for pricing listings and underwriting assets. Once verified they provide a nice historical record of a transaction which professionals can point to when making a decision. However there a number of downsides to relying too heavily on taking rents as comparables. Mentioned earlier, they lose relevance rapidly as time goes on. Especially in periods of market volatility taking rents quickly fail to reflect the current market environment and trends in market pricing. As just a data point they lose the context of the available supply and numerous other factors that led to the deal price. Most importantly when they are distilled down to a deal price on a per square foot basis, they become stripped away from all of the factors that led to the two parties coming to an agreement. The taking rent per square foot doesn't reflect the length of time on the market, or landlord concessions such as tenant improvement allowance, free rent, and landlord build out required to secure the deal. Without this context taking rents on a per square foot basis can become somewhat meaningless. We believe strongly that asking prices are the most important data point for underwriting assets and pricing out new availabilities, not to mention searching for availabilities. For this reason we will continue to expand the reach of Agorafy in the hope of increasing transparency in the New York real estate market. Our platform is built on verified asking prices to provide access and value to every market participant in the city. Richard Du is the founder and CEO of Agorafy, New York, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking