News: Brokerage

NY Appeals Court rules in favor of former property owners in Long Beach Superblock Condemnation

The New York State Appellate Division has upheld the State Supreme Court's 2012 determination that two former property owners within the Long Beach "Superblock" are owed $5.5 million in additional compensation, as well as interest which to date has accrued to $3.1 million, for their condemned properties based on the value of those parcels being part of a larger development. In 2006, the City of Long Beach acquired, via condemnation, five undeveloped parcels of oceanfront property which had been owned by Louis Bombart and Steve Silverberg since the late 1970's. The properties are within the last remaining block of undeveloped oceanfront city land in New York State -- a 6-acre area known as the "Superblock". "While the property owners paid taxes and insurance on these properties, development had continually been blocked for decades, first when the city cut off ingress and egress to these parcels in the 1980s and then by a construction moratorium on the Superblock site in the 1990s," said Mark Mulholland, of Ruskin Moscou Faltischek (Uniondale, NY). "Throughout the years there had been numerous private Superblock proposals that were based on the assemblage of properties, and in fact the City of Long Beach itself had solicited proposals for Superblock development as a single site," Mulholland noted. "The Supreme Court, and ultimately the Appellate Division, concurred with our argument that the highest and best use of these parcels should be determined as part of an assembled site." In its decision, the Appellate Division recognized the property owners' argument that "...a claimant is entitled to the fair market value of its property for its highest and best use even though that use is in connection with adjoining properties, provided there is a reasonable probability that the condemned property would be combined with other tracts in the reasonably near future." (Matter of Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 86AD3d 314, 320, quoting Olson v United States, 292 US 246, 256). In 2012 the Supreme Court ordered an additional $5.5 million to be paid to the former owners on top of the initial $3 million advance payment, as well interest which continues to accrue at 6%; this decision was upheld by the Appellate Division January 14, 2015. With the award of legal fees, the former property owners are now owed more than $10 million from the City of Long Beach. For more than 45 years, Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, a sixty member professional firm, headquartered in Uniondale, New York, has built a reputation as one of the region's leading providers of innovative legal services. Its attorneys are practical, experienced advocates who measure their success by their clients' success. Cornerstone groups in all major practice areas of the law are represented at the firm, including corporate & securities, financial services, commercial litigation, digital media, energy, intellectual property, health care, real estate, employment and trusts & estates. Clients include large and mid-sized corporations, privately held businesses, institutions and individuals.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced