News: Spotlight Content

Influx of former city-owned properties on market as compliance period ends

A New York City housing policy initiated during the Koch Administration has resulted in an influx of formerly city-owned buildings coming on the market because owners have reached the end of their compliance period or have expiring benefits. These buildings are unique because they were among the thousands transferred during New York City's Department of Housing Preservation and Development's Vacant Buildings Program, in which partnerships agreed to completely renovate the properties and enter into regulatory agreements, in exchange for low-interest financing or low-income housing tax credits. At Ariel Property Advisors, we're evaluating more of these buildings because the initial 15-year compliance period has been met or the J-51 benefits have expired. While many of the buildings will continue to be subject to rent stabilization guidelines or tenancy restrictions for anywhere from 5 to 20 more years, they present investors with a unique opportunity to purchase properties at a significant discount compared to similar, unregulated ones. For example, we recently closed on a portfolio of eight buildings with more than 200 units located in Upper Manhattan, Brooklyn, and the Bronx that sold for a total of $12 million. The price roughly represents a 6% cap rate with a tremendous upside in the rents. However, the discount is apparent when one looks at the substantially discounted price per s/f and price per unit, which equates to approximately $77 per s/f and $68,000 per unit. The returns are so low and so restricted, that many investors indicated that they are interested merely in buying the cheap bricks for their grandchildren and great-grandchildren, not themselves. While it may be difficult to envision, the modern, rapidly developing Upper Manhattan of today was once one of the hardest hit by disinvestment and housing abandonment. In the 1970s and 1980s, New York City became the "the landlord of last resort" as it seized control of thousands of vacant, dilapidated multifamily buildings in neighborhoods throughout the city for nonpayment of taxes. By the mid-1980s, the city had foreclosed on so many buildings that it found itself owning about 100,000 housing units that it didn't have the financial resources or capacity to manage, depriving residents of much needed housing stock and blighting communities throughout the boroughs. Mayor Ed Koch took steps to combat this crisis with an ambitious 10-year, $5 billion capital program that offered the assets and financing to responsible owners, developers, tenant cooperatives, and community development groups. Subsequent administrations continued the 10-year plan and also created new initiatives to transfer city-owned buildings to new owners. Northern Manhattan was one of the greatest beneficiaries of these programs, though Bedford-Stuyvesant, the South Bronx, East New York, Bushwick, and Jamaica also received significant resources. In exchange, new landlords entered into agreements with the city that set and stabilized rents at moderate levels. Some programs required the units only be rented to tenants that fell within certain restricted income requirements. After 15 to 30 years, the units would revert to rent stabilization laws or provide an option for converting to co-ops. We expect more buildings in these programs to come to market in the next few years for several reasons. First, many major landlords have large holdings of these properties and now wish to deploy the significant equity they have accumulated to more growth-oriented assets. Second, partnerships formed in the 1980s and 1990s may no longer be relevant to the goals of the principals, leading to an eventual sale. Finally, after several decades of managing these assets, some owners simply want to retire. While we advise all buyers to thoroughly review the regulatory agreements and be prepared for the long haul, properties exiting their compliance period will continue to present an excellent opportunity to acquire relatively inexpensive, well-maintained, long-term real estate investments. Shimon Shkury is founder and president of Ariel Property Advisors, New York, N.Y.
MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.