News: Brokerage

How new residential foreclosure laws affect commercial lending

On Dec. 15, 2009 Albany passed legislation that changes present residential foreclosure laws. These changes also have a substantial impact on commercial lender's rights and responsibilities. The well intended purpose of the amendments was to further protect distressed homeowners, prevent blighted neighborhoods, establish tenant protections, and prevent homeowner rescue scams. However, the result will be detrimental to commercial lenders as the new law will lengthen the foreclosure process, increase expenses, introduce new lender responsibilities and liabilities, and hamper the liquidity and balance sheets of the banks. "Residential real property" is newly defined to include property improved by a building/structure that may be used, partly or wholly, as a residence, including co-op, apartment, and mixed-use buildings. The law imposes a duty on banks to maintain the premises and gives tenants the right to remain in a dwelling post-foreclosure. Banks must continue to pay real estate taxes and insurance, and may have to provide utilities and other services to properties that are not generating income. Reports show 140 banks failed in 2009. The estimated average failed bank costs the FDIC $261 million. The pre-amended foreclosure laws attacked predatory loans. Healthy banks stayed healthy by continuing to lend, with the ability to recoup their investment, while banks with illegitimate loans suffered the consequences. By slowing the foreclosure process and imposing additional costs and liabilities on all lenders, the amendments will further restrict lending activity and undermine stable institutions. Kathryn Sammon Burns, Esq. is an attorney at Forchelli, Curto, Deegan, Schwartz, Mineo, Cohn & Terrana LLP, Uniondale, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
AI comes to public relations, but be cautious, experts say - by Harry Zlokower

AI comes to public relations, but be cautious, experts say - by Harry Zlokower

Last month Bisnow scheduled the New York AI & Technology cocktail event on commercial real estate, moderated by Tal Kerret, president, Silverstein Properties, and including tech officers from Rudin Management, Silverstein Properties, structural engineering company Thornton Tomasetti and the founder of Overlay Capital Build,
Strategic pause - by Shallini Mehra and Chirag Doshi

Strategic pause - by Shallini Mehra and Chirag Doshi

Many investors are in a period of strategic pause as New York City’s mayoral race approaches. A major inflection point came with the Democratic primary victory of Zohran Mamdani, a staunch tenant advocate, with a progressive housing platform which supports rent freezes for rent