News: Brokerage

Assemblages 101: Developers employ strategy, handle risk - by Thomas Kearns

Thomas Kearns,
Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP

Assembling many parcels to create a single larger parcel on which a developer may build a large building is one of the more glamorous aspects of the real estate business. Many know the story of how Disney used dummy entities to quietly buy up tens of thousands of acres near Orlando before locals figured out what was happening. Keeping the plans quiet is thought to be key in keeping the pricing reasonable. The owner of a holdout parcel could use the knowledge that the developer has already committed to other parcels to leverage the price higher than the previous market price. But assemblages have unique aspects that make the individual transactions more difficult particularly in cities like New York where assemblages usually combine air rights and land. First, using a beard to start to acquire pieces of the project can be difficult. The beard necessarily has to have some autonomy to negotiate the deal. And to avoid creating the suspicion that an assemblage is being created, multiple beards, buyer brokers and multiple lawyers may be needed, all increasing the risk of a leak or a slip up revealing the true identity of the buyer. And, of course, beards need to be compensated. 

During my decades of representing New York, and particularly Manhattan, developers, I have found, perhaps surprisingly, that the value of beards may not be as high as in some other jurisdictions. Manhattan parcels tend to “NOAs,” an acronym I coined for Naturally Occurring Assemblages as play on the better known acronym, NORCs, Naturally Occurring Retirement Communities. Manhattan sites seem to be identified early as places where eventually someone will build something. Sometimes it’s a recalcitrant seller that may be the hold up, other times it might be rent regulated tenants, but the sites are obvious development sites so that pricing will not be a surprise – no owner will sell his or her land for less than it’s worth since all know the site is ripe for development. 

But while beards may not be as necessary, getting the key parcel or two under control still involves strategy and risk – the savvy developer can analyze a site and quickly see the controlling parcels that need to be controlled first. Once the key parcels are acquired or more typically placed under contract, then the balance of the assemblage can be acquired, since those owners may wind up with limited choices to sell. 

The legal aspects of the assemblage can be challenging. For example, a typical contract of sale will refer to an existing survey of the parcel but for a developer, that’s not enough - he or she must also get a survey of the adjacent parcels to make sure there are no strips between the various parcels. For air rights purchases, the agreed setbacks for the air rights seller’s parcel need to take into account the design of the building to be created, which is difficult to determine for the early acquired parcels – how can the design architect create the design until the final pieces of the assemblage are determined? Often these issues create significant risk for the developer who has to place big non-refundable deposits on the early parcels, but experienced developers and counsel can create alterative roadmaps to success. 

Thomas Kearns is a partner with Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP’s real estate department, New York, N.Y.

 

MORE FROM Brokerage

AmTrustRE secures 5,754 s/f lease with GKV Architects at 360 Lexington Avenue

Manhattan, NY AmTrustRE has executed a 5,754 s/f lease at its premier boutique Midtown East office tower, 360 Lexington Ave., with longtime partner GKV Architects. The award-winning firm will occupy a portion of the 14th floor. >“GKV Architects has been a trusted partner to AmTrustRE for over two decades, playing an integral role in shaping and elevating several
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.