News: Brokerage

A lawyer discusses venue and choice of law designations by C. Jaye Berger

C. Jaye Berger, Law Offices of C. Jaye Berger C. Jaye Berger, Law Offices of C. Jaye Berger

Towards the end of most contracts, there are usually a number of “standard” provisions, such as: there will be no oral modifications; and the agreement will be binding on successors and assigns. Most people tend to gloss over them, but sometimes these “boilerplate” provisions can take on an unexpected level of importance.

Let’s say the owner of the project is from New York, and the project is in New York. However, the architect is from New Jersey and also happens to have a license in New York. The contract very clearly says that jurisdiction of any lawsuits arising from the project will be in New Jersey and shall be governed by the law of New Jersey. At first glance it seems like it must have been a mistake, but it is very clearly stated. Looking closer at the background and the facts, it would appear that the architect just used the first available contract form he found in the New Jersey office and no one bothered to look more closely at this provision. Certainly no one had an attorney review the contract closely before it was signed. However, these are the kinds of things attorneys look for and notice. The firm had an office in New Jersey when the contract was executed, so the choice is not a “crazy” one. There will probably be motions filed for and against the enforcement of the provision and it may well be upheld.

A contractor had a printed, fill-in- the-blank purchase order. The topics that most people would consider the most important, were typed or written into the contract. However, the arbitration provision was printed into the agreement in a small font. Upon inspection, with a magnifying glass, it said that arbitration would be in the county where the contractor is located. This is not where the project was located or the witnesses, but it was upheld.

These examples highlight the need to have knowledgeable attorneys review contracts before they are signed.

C. Jaye Berger, Esq. is an attorney at Law Offices C. Jaye Berger, Manhattan, N.Y.

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Strategic pause - by Shallini Mehra and Chirag Doshi

Strategic pause - by Shallini Mehra and Chirag Doshi

Many investors are in a period of strategic pause as New York City’s mayoral race approaches. A major inflection point came with the Democratic primary victory of Zohran Mamdani, a staunch tenant advocate, with a progressive housing platform which supports rent freezes for rent
AI comes to public relations, but be cautious, experts say - by Harry Zlokower

AI comes to public relations, but be cautious, experts say - by Harry Zlokower

Last month Bisnow scheduled the New York AI & Technology cocktail event on commercial real estate, moderated by Tal Kerret, president, Silverstein Properties, and including tech officers from Rudin Management, Silverstein Properties, structural engineering company Thornton Tomasetti and the founder of Overlay Capital Build,
Behind the post: Why reels, stories, and shorts work for CRE (and how to use them) - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

Behind the post: Why reels, stories, and shorts work for CRE (and how to use them) - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

Let’s be real: if you’re still only posting photos of properties, you’re missing out. Reels, Stories, and Shorts are where attention lives, and in commercial real estate, attention is currency.
Lasting effects of eminent domain on commercial development - by Sebastian Jablonski

Lasting effects of eminent domain on commercial development - by Sebastian Jablonski

The state has the authority to seize all or part of privately owned commercial real estate for public use by the power of eminent domain. Although the state is constitutionally required to provide just compensation to the property owner, it frequently fails to account