News: Brokerage

A lawyer discusses venue and choice of law designations by C. Jaye Berger

C. Jaye Berger, Law Offices of C. Jaye Berger C. Jaye Berger, Law Offices of C. Jaye Berger

Towards the end of most contracts, there are usually a number of “standard” provisions, such as: there will be no oral modifications; and the agreement will be binding on successors and assigns. Most people tend to gloss over them, but sometimes these “boilerplate” provisions can take on an unexpected level of importance.

Let’s say the owner of the project is from New York, and the project is in New York. However, the architect is from New Jersey and also happens to have a license in New York. The contract very clearly says that jurisdiction of any lawsuits arising from the project will be in New Jersey and shall be governed by the law of New Jersey. At first glance it seems like it must have been a mistake, but it is very clearly stated. Looking closer at the background and the facts, it would appear that the architect just used the first available contract form he found in the New Jersey office and no one bothered to look more closely at this provision. Certainly no one had an attorney review the contract closely before it was signed. However, these are the kinds of things attorneys look for and notice. The firm had an office in New Jersey when the contract was executed, so the choice is not a “crazy” one. There will probably be motions filed for and against the enforcement of the provision and it may well be upheld.

A contractor had a printed, fill-in- the-blank purchase order. The topics that most people would consider the most important, were typed or written into the contract. However, the arbitration provision was printed into the agreement in a small font. Upon inspection, with a magnifying glass, it said that arbitration would be in the county where the contractor is located. This is not where the project was located or the witnesses, but it was upheld.

These examples highlight the need to have knowledgeable attorneys review contracts before they are signed.

C. Jaye Berger, Esq. is an attorney at Law Offices C. Jaye Berger, Manhattan, N.Y.

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,