News: Brokerage

Thrive Buildings complete a case study on a New York City university

A New York City university sought to minimize energy consumption in its most energy-intensive spaces on campus to comply with the regulatory requirements of Local Law 97 (LL97). After a comprehensive assessment of the university's portfolio, Thrive Buildings identified a building with a large potential for energy reduction. Next, Thrive formulated a project specifically tailored to curtail energy usage within the laboratories while capitalizing on the utility rebates available in the NYC market.

Thrive's assessment of the entire lab building pinpointed the areas most conducive to airflow optimization. Additionally, recent expansions had amplified lab square footage, posing challenges in maintaining adequate exhaust cfm levels in various sections of the building.

To address these concerns, Thrive introduced Aircuity’s multi-parameter, centralized demand control ventilation platform, which was installed in 114 lab spaces. Thrive managed the entire project, overseeing the design, installation, and initiation of the solution, while also handling the rebate application process. The local utility company's robust rebate program covered 70% of the project costs, further enhancing its financial feasibility. 

RESULTS

Incorporating a Niagara Control System atop the Siemens building management system, the site team achieved room-level optimization and furnished airflow and energy dashboarding. This initiative resulted in a substantial reduction in carbon emissions, effectively aligning the building with LL97 targets until 2030. 

The implementation of Aircuity's system led to a reduction in overall cfm by 60,000, eliminating the need for any mechanical upgrades, despite the increase in lab square footage. This comprehensive approach not only facilitated compliance with regulatory standards but also showcased effective lab energy and Scope 1 carbon reduction practices, positioning the university on a sustainable trajectory for the future.

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced