News: Brokerage

The impact of rent regulation - by Robert Khodadadian

Robert Khodadadian

For landlords, the playbook had long been simple and lucrative: buy run-down buildings that are, in New York lingo, rent-stabilized, fix them up, pass along the expense to tenants by raising rents (allowed under the regulations), cash out, and repeat. Once rents approached $2,800 a month, owners could charge what the market would bear, turning the apartments into potential gold mines.

New York has had some form of rent regulation since 1969. However, in 2019, New York state lawmakers rewrote the rules, reducing how much landlords could raise rents after renovations. More importantly, the apartments no longer leave the program when rents rise high enough, leaving property owners to now face the dilemma of investing in aging units without the certainty of recouping these investments through rents. Essentially, this recalibrated the balance of power between landlords and tenants.

As a result, the New York City rental market has undergone a seismic shift in recent years. Last year, buildings with at least one rent-stabilized apartment sold on average for $203,000 a unit, down 34% since 2019. Despite these challenges, investor interest in rent-stabilized properties persists, albeit at discounted prices compared to pre-regulation valuations.

The recent sale of Sentinel’s portfolio of 24 properties totaling 1.2 million s/f for $180 million — a significant drop from its original price of nearly $300 million — exemplifies this trend. Sales such as 658 W 188th St. (bought for $23.1 million in 2015 and sold for $10.7 million in 2023), 519 W 143rd St. (bought for $9.3 million in 2016 and sold for $3.8 million in 2023), or the recent transaction involving 120 and 125 Riverside Dr., which sold to Aya Acquisitions at a 64% discount from the previous purchase price, illustrate the multifaceted nature of the market response to regulatory changes.

As landlords and investors navigate the intricacies of New York City’s rent stabilization laws, the debate over the financial viability of rent-stabilized properties continues. The real estate landscape in New York City is ever- evolving, shaped by a myriad of factors, from regulatory reforms to shifting investor preferences. Understanding these dynamics is essential for stakeholders seeking to navigate the complexities of this dynamic market.

Robert Khodadadian is a commercial real estate broker with Skyline Properties, Manhattan, NY.

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,