News: Brokerage

The impact of NYC’s housing crisis on commercial real estate and tenant mobility - by Nancy Zafrani

Nancy Zafrani

New York City has long been one of the most expensive places to buy and own a home. Yet, there remains a housing crisis in the region. As the housing crisis grows in NYC, its ripple impacts the commercial real estate market and tenant mobility, hampering people’s efforts to achieve their goals of financial freedom.

Consider the current details. In 2023, the rental vacancy rate in NYC was 1.4%, which is the lowest it has been since 1968. Just two years before, that vacancy rate stood at 4.54%. It is expected that by 2032, a shortage of 500,000 units is likely. The Regional Plan Association states that, in order to meet and overcome those shortages, the city will need to add at least 473,000 new units to its already-limited city footprint.

Data indicates that higher price points, high housing underproduction, and limited mobility with long-term leases drive tenants away. New Yorkers move outward to the surrounding communities to find jobs and people. Ultimately, as people disperse, that directly translates into a drop in the local business economy, which can result in lower commercial real estate prices.

Rising rents negatively impact the entire commercial real estate (CRE) market and all valuations of such locations. A CRE is owned for its income-producing potential. Commercial property values are driven by cap rates, which tend to correlate with interest rates. As the cap rate increases, the property values fall, assuming constant net operating income.

Higher interest rates make mortgages out of reach for many in New York City. However, they also impact tenant mobility rates. Tenants cannot remain where the cost of living is too high, and with costs rising as housing shortages increase, this is a very real concern for those renting in the city.

Higher costs drive people away, hurting commercial real estate because it needs those customers to keep the doors open. At the same time, workers and residents are moving out of the city, where life may be more comfortable in terms of financial requirements.

When tenants move, they use moving companies to help them relocate. Yet, for those who are “stuck” in a rent-controlled apartment in NYC, it can be difficult to find another location to live that offers affordability. Fewer people can afford to move (especially those who are faced with trying to buy a home with very high interest rates.

Ultimately, the NYC housing crisis makes it far more challenging for commercial organizations to remain open as their customers are driven away. Tenants who would move and perhaps purchase a home cannot afford to do so with the high interest rates. This cycle of never-ending complications could hurt any organization.

Nancy Zafrani is the general manager of Oz Moving & Storage, New York, NY.

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking