News: Brokerage

The impact of COVID-19 on cities - by Hugh Kelly

Hugh Kelly

Of all the organs in our body, the eye is perhaps the most extraordinary. We consider it our window on the world, but it is so much more than a mere transparent pane of glass. The eye has tremendous powers of accommodation to changes in the world, from bright light to deep darkness. It has the remarkable power to see in great close-up attention to detail, but also has a range of vision that extends toward the vanishing point of infinity. Moreover, thanks to the coordination of binocular vision, we humans enjoy depth of field–the ability to hold in view objects near and far and to smoothly transition across distance. 

It would be great if those trying to speculate about the impact of the threefold disruption of 2020 on America’s cities could harness the powers of the eye in their analysis and commentary. Unfortunately, the majority of the instant analysis in the news, on social media, and over the Internet suffers from myopic vision. The disruptions–a public health emergency, economic dislocation, and powerful social stresses–have understandably placed much of our focus on the near-term. We are wrestling with questions about many things formerly taken for granted: our commute to work; interactions in the office, in the store, in schools and entertainment venues; our built environment and its ability to function during and after the COVID-era.

Such close-up vision is important. It would be delusional to pretend that we don’t need to accommodate to changed circumstances. A nostalgia for the “old normal” has led some cities and states to rush back to pre-pandemic behaviors, and we are already seeing the folly of that nostalgia in accelerating rates of hospitalizations and mortality around the country. So as New York opens up again, we need to accommodate ourselves to the ongoing health risks in offices, shops, hotels, restaurants and bars, and other places of public gathering. 

Yes, this comes at a cost. Yes, New York may need to expect a holiday season without a million-person Thanksgiving Day parade crowd or Rockettes at Radio City. And, yes, we should expect a hit to New York’s real estate market now, and as much as a year or two ahead.

But take care about extrapolating the present emergency indefinitely into the future. I’m old enough to remember people saying of New York in the 1970s, “Last one out, turn off the lights.” After 9/11, there were assumptions that no one would ever again lease high floors in skyscrapers, and that businesses would scatter from Manhattan to the safety of the exurbs. That’s why longer-range vision needs to complement our short-range adjustments. 

Urban resiliency is built upon the ability to innovate, and innovation is one of great strengths of New York. We have come to appreciate what is now seen as “essential” to our economy–and that is the deep and diverse population that undergirds our services economy, both blue-collar and white-collar. It is the attractive features that bring young people here, seeking not just a job but a career–and careers are not built over Zoom. It is the understanding that apparently obsolete forms of real estate (manufacturing lofts once; empty hotels now) can be repurposed to satisfying space demands that were frustrated by scarcity and cost in boom times.

Having great depth of field in our vision of the future is critical now and the years ahead. Our mantra should be: The greatest cities are not the problem-free places; they are the problem-solving places.

Hugh Kelly, PhD, CRE, is a real estate economist and special advisor to Fordham University Real Estate Institute, New York, N.Y.

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced