News: Brokerage

Rising interest rate's value effect

At the beginning of the year I forecasted that interest rates would increase and put upward pressure on overall capitalization rates. The result would be a negative effect on values by the end of the year. After all, mortgage interest rates were at some of the lowest levels in modern history. It was inevitable! The economic recovery has been modest over the last four years fueled primarily by low interest rates and stimulus spending. However, this came with a steep price. Over the past four years, with federal yearly budget deficits averaging approximately $1.2 trillion per year, our federal debt is now approximately $16.75 trillion. The "contingent" national debt is approaching $60-$90+ trillion depending upon the sources you believe. The "contingent" national debt considers future entitlement obligations. In order to spend at such a high level, federal borrowing and printing money was put into motion. The various Quantitative Easing (QE 1-3) programs instituted by the Federal Reserve was spending $86 billion per month to purchase U.S. treasuries and mortgage backed securities in order to keep interest rates down. This was an artificial market intervention. Something had to give! Without this and other artificial intervention; interest rates would be substantially higher and the economy would be at a much lower level. This artificial intervention actually started during the boom President Bush's years highlighted by 2005 under Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan and continued with Ben Bernanke beginning in 2006. President Bush combined substantial fiscal measures such as tax cuts which did not necessitate as much Federal Reserve intervention. But since 2009 artificial monetary intervention has exploded with no overall tax cuts and the results have been modest positive results. There is no question that the economy and real estate market has improved substantially since 2009. However, much of it has been driven by the artificially low interest rates over the last 3-4 years and the rock bottom markets of 2009. Thus, there was no way to go but up! Within the last few weeks rates have been increasing because the Federal Reserve has slowed down the Quantitative Easing programs. With the increase in the interest rates comes an increase in capitalization rates. However, the % increase will not be to the level of an interest rate % increase. It will be more aligned with the % increase of the mortgage constants. A few months ago a good quality suburban apartment project could get financing of 4.5%, 30-year amortization or an annual constant of 6.08022%. If the value is based upon the sum of the separately valued equity position and mortgage position respectively and using a $10 million mortgage; the annual debt service is approximately $608,022. If the interest rate increases to 5% with a 30-year amortization, an annual constant of 6.44186% or $644,186 annual debt service results. This is an annual decrease in cash throwoff of $36,164. Using the mortgage constant of 6.44186%, the capitalized decreased mortgage value is $561,391 or a decrease of 5.61% based upon the $10 million of mortgage value. The absolute interest rate increase was 0.50% or 50 basis points or an 11.11% increase from 4.5% to 5%. The absolute mortgage value decrease was 5.61%. Thus, this shows that there is not 100% correlation with absolute changes in interest rates and value. The value % decrease only reflected approximately 50% of the absolute interest rate change. Using the equity dividend band of investment build up method, the overall capitalization rate using 4.5% is 7.14%. The overall capitalization rate with 5% interest rate was 7.46%. The cap rate differential was 32 basis points or % change of 4.48% which is near the change in the mortgage value outlined above. In conclusion, higher interest rates certainly will have a negative impact on value but only at a fraction of the absolute interest rate change. The good news is any increases in rents, decreases in vacancies and decreases in natural gas costs will offset some of the negative effects on values precipitated by higher interest rates. John Rynne, MAI, SRA is the president and owner of Rynne, Murphy & Associates, Inc., Rochester, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Lasting effects of eminent domain on commercial development - by Sebastian Jablonski

Lasting effects of eminent domain on commercial development - by Sebastian Jablonski

The state has the authority to seize all or part of privately owned commercial real estate for public use by the power of eminent domain. Although the state is constitutionally required to provide just compensation to the property owner, it frequently fails to account
Strategic pause - by Shallini Mehra and Chirag Doshi

Strategic pause - by Shallini Mehra and Chirag Doshi

Many investors are in a period of strategic pause as New York City’s mayoral race approaches. A major inflection point came with the Democratic primary victory of Zohran Mamdani, a staunch tenant advocate, with a progressive housing platform which supports rent freezes for rent
AI comes to public relations, but be cautious, experts say - by Harry Zlokower

AI comes to public relations, but be cautious, experts say - by Harry Zlokower

Last month Bisnow scheduled the New York AI & Technology cocktail event on commercial real estate, moderated by Tal Kerret, president, Silverstein Properties, and including tech officers from Rudin Management, Silverstein Properties, structural engineering company Thornton Tomasetti and the founder of Overlay Capital Build,
Behind the post: Why reels, stories, and shorts work for CRE (and how to use them) - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

Behind the post: Why reels, stories, and shorts work for CRE (and how to use them) - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

Let’s be real: if you’re still only posting photos of properties, you’re missing out. Reels, Stories, and Shorts are where attention lives, and in commercial real estate, attention is currency.