News: Brokerage

Penn Station, transit oriented development and the looming threat of eminent domain, part 2 - by Jennifer Polovetsky

 

Jennifer Polovetsky

Part one of this series appeared in the September 27th edition of the New York Real Estate Journal.

This article series explains the eminent domain process, which will very likely be used as part of the impending Penn Station expansion project in New York City. This second article will delve into the typical procedures around compensation for property owners and tenants.

How do property owners and tenants get paid? Do they compete against one another for the payment?
Owners and business tenants are entitled to separate condemnation awards (see Rose v. State, 24 N.Y.2d 80 (1969)). Property owners are entitled to an award for the value of their real estate based upon a highest and best use analysis, while business tenants are entitled to a separate award for their compensable trade fixtures, based upon a reproduction cost less depreciation valuation. Trade fixtures are usually machines, equipment, and/or tools that your business regularly uses in its trade, without limitation. Trade fixtures can also include certain improvements that a business owner has made to the leased premises, subject to the terms of the lease agreement.

What if the property owner or business tenant doesn’t like the compensation being offered to them by the government or its developer?
Although New York’s eminent domain laws require the condemning authority to appraise your property and offer to purchase it from you before the taking, you have the right to refuse such an offer if you believe it is too low. It is not wrong to contest or object to an initial compensation offer – you are simply exercising your statutory and Fifth Amendment rights. In such an event, the condemning authority will proceed with the seizure of your property by eminent domain, and it is obligated to make you an offer of “just compensation.” within a reasonable time after you have been forcibly stripped of your ownership rights. Oftentimes, property owners and business tenants believe that these initial post-taking offers are unfavorable. In that case, property owners and business tenants are entitled to file claims for additional compensation, in either the New York State Supreme Courts, or the New York State Court of Claims.

The main objective for condemnees is to never leave your rights on the table. I have practiced eminent domain law for 22 years, first for the government and then in the private sector. Unfortunately, I have seen too many people lose enormous amounts of money, as well as their legal rights, because they either waited too long to act or didn’t have experienced counsel. If I could give one piece of advice to potential condemnees, it would be to speak to an experienced eminent domain lawyer early on. Eminent domain is a complicated process, and the laws were enacted to make the condemnee whole financially. New York’s eminent domain laws, however, put the burden on the property owners and business tenants to fight for their financial and legal rights. Being made whole is never automatic – it is always something that condemnees and their counsel must fight for.

Jennifer Polovetsky is the co-chair of the eminent domain practice at Herrick, Feinstein LLP, New York, N.Y.

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.