News: Brokerage

NAIOP Upstate New York chapter visits State Capitol

Leaders from the NAIOP Upstate New York chapter visited the State Capitol in Albany on May 19, making this their third annual visit. Joining the Upstate New York chapter were leaders from the NAIOP New York City chapter, the downstate suburban New York chapter, and Unshackle Upstate, a bi-partisan coalition that represents over 45,000 companies in Upstate New York. These New York leaders met with representatives in both the Assembly and the senate who represent our areas and discussed pending legislation that will affect developers in our region and our state. During their visit to the State House, the NAIOP Upstate New York chapter members met with the following senators: * Jim Alesi * Mike Nozzolio * Mike Ranzenhofer * Joe Robach * Bill Stachowski * Antoine Thompson * Dale Volker The group also met with assembly members including: * Jane Corwin * Dennis Gabryszak * Jim Hayes * Brian Kolb * Joe Morelle * Crystal Peoples * Robin Schimminger The following legislation was discussed: * Empire Zone Legislation: Of paramount of importance is the Empire Zone Budget bill, S5598. The unclear definition of shirtchangers and the look back to 1-1-08 are issues that would be potentially devastating to businesses that have made substantial investment based on program criteria established at the time of certification. To change the criteria during the benefit period is damaging to these businesses and sends the message New York is no longer interested in businesses locating to our state. * Industrial Development Agency Reform Legislation: As devastating to business is S1241, the IDA bill. A prevailing wage component should in no way be associated with private projects receiving IDA incentives. Businesses receiving these benefits are required to prove they can and will locate outside the area if not for such assistance. To add 23+% in cost to these projects by requiring prevailing wage would undermine any benefit received, consequently doing away with the intent of the program. We need to stabilize, grow and bring businesses back to the state. This legislation achieves no benefit. * Wetlands Legislation: In addition, the Wetland bill S5642 as it currently reads reduces state oversight from 12.5 acres down to one acre. We do not support increases in NYDEC jurisdiction of wetlands as found in the current legislation. A vague definition of wetland will lead to inconsistent results. NAIOP will support wetland legislation that creates criteria that is reproducible and scientifically defensible. * SEQR Legislation: Continuing, the SEQR Legislation is categorically devastating to development with no need to prove harm by the complainant opening the flood gates causing developers to cease doing business in the state. This could occur for any project regardless of whether or not legitimate standing exists. * Scaffold Law: Last, the Scaffold law is of great concern to our industry. This law has long outlived its intent. We need legislation that makes the worker responsible for their own negligence when the accident is the result of their own criminal, wrongful, or negligent behavior. Absolute liability, refusing the owner the right to defend themselves in court is unconstitutional. We support a healthy and safe environment for contractors and can provide necessary liability coverage without the burden of this mandate. Most of the representatives we met with agreed with us that these issues were too far reaching and should be modified to encourage developers to invest and develop in NYS. There will be much debate on many of these issue, and the lawmakers we met with were very pleased we brought these concerns to their attention. The reception we received from all our legislators was very cordial, and we hope NAIOP's efforts will bring about some change this legislative session. Thomas Thaney is the 2009 president of NAIOP Upstate New York, Pittsford, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking