News:
Spotlight Content
Posted: December 22, 2020
Michael Lefkowitz, Rosenberg & Estis, P.C.
Name: Michael Lefkowitz
Title: Managing Member
Company Name: Rosenberg & Estis, P.C.
What was your greatest professional accomplishment in 2020?
On June 1st, I was named managing member of the firm. I’ve been at the firm for 31 years, and having earned the faith, trust and respect of my partners to be appointed managing member is not just my greatest professional accomplishment of 2020, but of my career. Taking on this leadership position during the pandemic has been both challenging and rewarding: Working with my partners on decisions and adjustments to our practice, which certainly are out of the ordinary, having to adopt a work from home policy and continue to operate and serve clients in an efficient manner. I can say through these challenging times that we have maintained our successful law firm.
What aspects of working from home did you enjoy most?
Not actually the working from home, but being home. We have grown children all in their mid-20s. Pre-pandemic lockdown, we all lived in New York City, but not together. When the lockdown was ordered, and businesses began to work from home, our children, for the better part of the lockdown, came home and worked from home. Never thought I would again spend so much time with my children under one roof, have dinner with them every night, engage in family discussions night-in and night-out. I enjoyed watching as they turned our living room, dining and kitchen into a WeWork space. The open concept work environment was conducive to the millennial work style. My wife and I retreated to our home offices on different floors and on different sides of the house.
What are your predictions for commercial real estate in 2021?
While I don’t possess a crystal ball, my predictions for real estate in 2021 are as follows:
- Continued and considerable dislocation, distress, troubled assets and workouts will be the order of the day.
- States will likely continue to issue moratoriums and/or other protections and relief against foreclosure and evictions.
- Sales activity of luxury condominiums, hotel, office and retail sectors will continue to be sluggish.
- A low interest rate environment will help alleviate some of the hardships created by the pandemic on many of the sectors of commercial real estate.
Tags:
Spotlight Content
MORE FROM Spotlight Content
Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin
When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
.png)
.gif)
.jpg)
Columns and Thought Leadership
Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra
Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen
The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:
Formal Legislative Role
• Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian
In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe
Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.
.gif)