News: Brokerage

Letter of Intent - Transferring Development Rights

In 1968, New York City led the nation as the first major city to implement a tactic to Transfer Development Rights, better known as a TDR program. We all know that air rights can be transferred to an adjacent building, or, from corner to corner (as long as the "Granting" and "Receiving" properties are located on the same intersection and the "Granting Property" is landmarked). What many of us are unaware of, are the additional programs in place created to benefit specific New York City districts and support the growth and development of a handful of city neighborhoods. This program was originally instated to preserve historic districts and promote the creation of public spaces, as part of New York City's 2,800-page Zoning Resolution. Air Rights, as defined, is the available air space above a property that the owner has to enjoy, up to a reasonable distance as set forth in the Zoning Code. It is of course tempting for any investor/developer to utilize the excess development rights of an existing underutilized building to maximize the potential of their development site, but what about transferring air rights from a property not adjacent to one another? Although little-known by many investors in Manhattan, there are programs in place which allow development rights to be transferred to non-adjacent buildings within certain districts. Development Rights may be transferred from a landmark building, to any other building in the district (of course with the permission of the and the Community Board). This was created to help alleviate the financial burden of an owner of a historic building, who was not allowed to further utilize the available air rights above their property. Another prime example is within Community District Five in Manhattan; development rights can be transferred from a building with the "Theater Class" designation to any other site within the same community board, with board approval. There are two other prime examples of the potential transfer of development rights, both in prime locales. The Grand Central Sub-district, as well as the South Street Seaport Sub-district, have the ability to transfer their rights to other sites in order to increase development and add to the revitalization of certain areas. The remaining mechanism in place that can be employed to benefit development through the ability to transfer air rights to non-adjacent lots is the possibility to transfer Inclusionary Air Rights. The City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) enacted this Program in 1987, and it was originally intended specifically for R10 districts (NYC's most dense residential zoning), but within the past few years, the HPD has expanded the Program to include areas in several Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Queens locations. The "Receiving Site" must be within a half mile of the "Granting Site" in order to qualify, and must be granted a Certificate of Eligibility from the HPD. Given the influx of international money, and the fact that lenders are becoming increasingly competitive in their construction loans, we expect that development rights will continue to be scooped up by savvy developers looking to capitalize on their under-utilized neighbors (or any other building meeting the criteria, for that matter). Lee Silpe is the senior analyst at Berko & Associates, New York, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced