News: Spotlight Content

Leading energy companies moving to a greener future

Oil currently supplies more than 40% of total U.S. energy demands, and 99% of car fuels. Canadian crude oil has become especially important to the U.S. market; however, there are significant challenges such as inadequate heavy sour crude refining capacity, lack of pipelines to emerging markets, labor shortages, and serious environmental issues. Further afield, Africa, Russia, and the Far East also represent a growing potential source, but not without political issues. In today's "going green" world, alternative renewable energy sources like wind, solar, geothermal, hydrogen, and biomass play an important role in the future of U.S. energy delivery. Moving new technologies out of the laboratory and into the marketplace has resulted in a large number of new energy projects being developed by smaller, start-up companies that have the technological expertise but lack project execution experience. Because many of these projects are founded on green technologies that have had little or no project history, cost factors related to logistics and time lines are untested. The challenge is to merge innovation with sound business practices, delivering projects that are economically as well as environmentally viable. This is where firms like ours come into play. As one of the world's leading consultants in energy, Faithful+Gould has helped oil, gas, petrochemical and chemical companies deliver projects and programs on time and under budget for more than 60 years. The main issue in the beginning for these smaller companies is to assemble a sound business plan to get the support and funding they need, particularly in the ethanol and bio-fuel arenas. We act as their representative for financing and budgeting so that they can concentrate on technological innovation. We assist with a realistic estimate that includes such factors as energy transmission to remote locations, logistical costs, and project risk. Then, particularly for major corporate funders, we must show their shareholders that the projects will turn a profit in the long run. Beyond the initial estimate, we participate with our clients for the long term because getting the project funded is just the beginning. Making sure organization and processes are in place, as well as constant project monitoring and feedback, ensures that these new energy technologies will sustain our environment for the long haul. Sustainability must also be considered with whole life costs and affordability in the planning and design phases of a project. Faithful+Gould is LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certified by the United States Green Building Council to provide LEED consulting as an integral part of the green building process. Maintenance is another big issue that is untested by many of the newer technologies. We can help our clients obtain significant savings in maintenance by implementing contract strategies that build in wear-and-tear, as well as replacement. In addition to new energy technologies, traditional forms of energy are being ramped-up to deal with the growing need for power. We are seeing huge projects like $4 billion nuclear facilities that require multiple capabilities. In these instances, it is absolutely vital to put contract strategies in place that make the best use of limited resources. Several of Faithful+Gould's recent initiatives include project controls for programs of both clean fuels projects and NOx Reduction projects. Representative clients include many industry oil and gas majors. We have the advantage of an international network of offices to provide cost-effective support, regardless of where the project is engineered and subsequently built. Looking to the future, the exploration and extraction of energy are complex issues that will only become more challenging as natural resources are depleted. That is why, as new technologies are developed, firms like Faithful+Gould can help ensure their success. Trevor Green is senior V.P. of Faithful+Gould's Energy Business Stream, Houston, Tex.
MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.