News: Brokerage

Law: New York statutory residency test reinterpreted

New York State and New York City each impose an income tax on resident individuals.1 Residency can be established in either of two ways. If an individual is domiciled in New York, i.e., the taxpayer's permanent and primary home is located within the city and/or state of New York, that individual is a New York resident for income tax purposes.2 An individual who is not domiciled in New York, is taxed as a "statutory resident," if the individual "maintains a permanent place of abode" in New York and spends more than one hundred eighty-three (183) days of the taxable year in New York.3 The New York State Department of Taxation and Finance (the "NYSDTF") had successfully argued that the requirements for "statutory residency" are met when living quarters are permanent, capable of year-round use, and maintained by the taxpayer, even if the taxpayer did not actually dwell in the permanent place of abode, but only provided funds for its maintenance. On February 18, the New York Court of Appeals published its opinion in Gaied v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal, et al.4 The Court of Appeals held that New York's "statutory resident" test requires "some basis to conclude that the dwelling was actually utilized as the taxpayer's residence." The Court noted that the statutory intent was to prevent tax evasion by New York residents so the term "permanent place of abode" must be referring to the place of abode of the taxpayer. The decision in Gaied provides that, to establish statutory residency, it must be shown that the taxpayer possessed a personal residential interest as a permanent place of abode in the property being maintained by the taxpayer. 1. See, NY Tax Law §601 and New York City Administrative Code §11-1701. 2. See, NY Tax Law §605(b)(1)(A). 3. See, NY Tax Law §605(b)(1)(B). 4. — NY3d —, 2014 NY Slip Op 01101 (2014). This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports Barry Feldman is of counsel to Forchelli, Curto, Deegan, Schwartz, Mineo & Terrana, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Lasting effects of eminent domain on commercial development - by Sebastian Jablonski

Lasting effects of eminent domain on commercial development - by Sebastian Jablonski

The state has the authority to seize all or part of privately owned commercial real estate for public use by the power of eminent domain. Although the state is constitutionally required to provide just compensation to the property owner, it frequently fails to account
Strategic pause - by Shallini Mehra and Chirag Doshi

Strategic pause - by Shallini Mehra and Chirag Doshi

Many investors are in a period of strategic pause as New York City’s mayoral race approaches. A major inflection point came with the Democratic primary victory of Zohran Mamdani, a staunch tenant advocate, with a progressive housing platform which supports rent freezes for rent
Behind the post: Why reels, stories, and shorts work for CRE (and how to use them) - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

Behind the post: Why reels, stories, and shorts work for CRE (and how to use them) - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

Let’s be real: if you’re still only posting photos of properties, you’re missing out. Reels, Stories, and Shorts are where attention lives, and in commercial real estate, attention is currency.
AI comes to public relations, but be cautious, experts say - by Harry Zlokower

AI comes to public relations, but be cautious, experts say - by Harry Zlokower

Last month Bisnow scheduled the New York AI & Technology cocktail event on commercial real estate, moderated by Tal Kerret, president, Silverstein Properties, and including tech officers from Rudin Management, Silverstein Properties, structural engineering company Thornton Tomasetti and the founder of Overlay Capital Build,