News: Brokerage

Law: New York statutory residency test reinterpreted

New York State and New York City each impose an income tax on resident individuals.1 Residency can be established in either of two ways. If an individual is domiciled in New York, i.e., the taxpayer's permanent and primary home is located within the city and/or state of New York, that individual is a New York resident for income tax purposes.2 An individual who is not domiciled in New York, is taxed as a "statutory resident," if the individual "maintains a permanent place of abode" in New York and spends more than one hundred eighty-three (183) days of the taxable year in New York.3 The New York State Department of Taxation and Finance (the "NYSDTF") had successfully argued that the requirements for "statutory residency" are met when living quarters are permanent, capable of year-round use, and maintained by the taxpayer, even if the taxpayer did not actually dwell in the permanent place of abode, but only provided funds for its maintenance. On February 18, the New York Court of Appeals published its opinion in Gaied v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal, et al.4 The Court of Appeals held that New York's "statutory resident" test requires "some basis to conclude that the dwelling was actually utilized as the taxpayer's residence." The Court noted that the statutory intent was to prevent tax evasion by New York residents so the term "permanent place of abode" must be referring to the place of abode of the taxpayer. The decision in Gaied provides that, to establish statutory residency, it must be shown that the taxpayer possessed a personal residential interest as a permanent place of abode in the property being maintained by the taxpayer. 1. See, NY Tax Law §601 and New York City Administrative Code §11-1701. 2. See, NY Tax Law §605(b)(1)(A). 3. See, NY Tax Law §605(b)(1)(B). 4. — NY3d —, 2014 NY Slip Op 01101 (2014). This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports Barry Feldman is of counsel to Forchelli, Curto, Deegan, Schwartz, Mineo & Terrana, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced