News: Brokerage

Law: Land surveys – Costs and benefits by Lindsay Mesh Lotito

A property survey’s importance cannot be understated. Surveys show: Dimensions/description of the premises; location of buildings, fences and other improvements; relationship between the subject property and adjoining parcels, including encroachments by a neighboring property onto the subject property, and vice-a-versa; and provides discovery of facts that may not be of record, i.e. water courses, utility lines, easements, etc. It is “read into” and becomes part of the title insurance policy. The cost of a survey can be significant, depending on the size and layout of the parcel. 

Whether purchasing or refinancing a property, owners are generally faced with two options: Obtaining a new survey, or updating an existing survey. Prices can vary greatly for either option; factors determining the price of the survey-size of the property, accessibility, time spent by surveyor and the survey company itself. 

Whether to obtain a new survey or update an existing survey depends on the age of an existing survey; whether there have been changes to structures on or around the property; size of the transaction; and requirements of the owner’s lender.

A borrower who owned property for many years and is refinancing a mortgage loan wants to minimize closing costs, including paying for a new survey. A lender accepting an updated survey depends on: Who the old survey is certified to; if the survey conforms to the legal description; and when it was last updated. An updated survey is useful, to the extent it identifies changes to the property since the date of the old survey. 

In certain special circumstances, a borrower can avoid getting a new or updated survey altogether, where a title company will ensure the lender there are no changes to a property, based on the property owner’s affidavit. 

Whether to update or get a new survey is a property-specific decision made in consultation with your attorney.

Lindsay Mesh Lotito is a banking & finance and RE attorney at Forchelli Deegan Terrana LLP, Uniondale, N.Y.

MORE FROM Brokerage

AmTrustRE secures 5,754 s/f lease with GKV Architects at 360 Lexington Avenue

Manhattan, NY AmTrustRE has executed a 5,754 s/f lease at its premier boutique Midtown East office tower, 360 Lexington Ave., with longtime partner GKV Architects. The award-winning firm will occupy a portion of the 14th floor. >“GKV Architects has been a trusted partner to AmTrustRE for over two decades, playing an integral role in shaping and elevating several
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,