News: Brokerage

Improper use of background checks can be costly

Recently, two companies separately agreed to pay civil penalties totaling a combined $77,000 to resolve accusations that they violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act in connection with their hiring processes. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) brought separate lawsuits in federal court against Quality Terminal Services, LLC and Rail Terminal Services, LLC. In both lawsuits, the FTC alleged that the companies contracted with a credit agency to conduct background checks on employees and applicants, including criminal record reviews, and then made hiring and firing decisions based on those background checks. The FTC also alleged that each company failed to provide the employees with the notices required by the Fair Credit Reporting Act. These cases are an important reminder that the act applies to most employers that conduct background checks on employees and applicants and highlight the need for them to understand and follow the requirements of the act. The act is implicated when an employer hires a third party to conduct background checks and seek employees' and job applicants' credit records, criminal histories and other background information. The act requires an employer to provide the applicant or employee with notice before it takes adverse action, which includes dismissal or rejection of an employment application, based on a consumer report. The employer must also provide the employee with a copy of the report, identify the agency that provided the report to the employer, and inform the affected individual of his or her right to obtain a free copy of the report to dispute its accuracy. The cases against Quality Terminal and Rail Terminal illustrate that the FTC can bring an action on behalf of employees, but employees also have the ability to bring their own action for violations of the act. The result could be equally damaging, as a successful employee in such an action can recover attorneys' fees and three times their actual damages. Any employer that is using a third party to conduct background checks on employees or applicants should ensure that it is familiar with, and following, the requirements of the act. Daniel Morris is a counsel at Clifton Budd & DeMaria LLP, New York, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
New York’s streets are full again, and the retail numbers prove it - by Noam Aziz

New York’s streets are full again, and the retail numbers prove it - by Noam Aziz

Walk down any New York block this year and you can feel it. The sidewalks are crowded, the storefronts are lit, and the energy that defines this city is back at full volume.
Artificial intelligence in lending - by Lindsay Mesh Lotito

Artificial intelligence in lending - by Lindsay Mesh Lotito

Artificial intelligence (AI) is beginning to help transform lending by enhancing decision-making, improving risk management and streamlining operations. With AI-powered tools that analyze vast amounts of data, lenders are able to assess borrower creditworthiness more accurately and efficiently. AI can evaluate a wide range of factors,
Hunt commercial real estate question and answer: The total cost of relocation - by David Hunt

Hunt commercial real estate question and answer: The total cost of relocation - by David Hunt

You have a right to be concerned. I am always surprised at the companies that will negotiate the price of their new facility down to the last dollar, without thoroughly analyzing their
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking