News: Brokerage

Deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure is a useful innovative solution

Current market conditions have necessitated some innovative solutions to current situations. Although the deed-in-lieu has been around for quite some time, most recently it has received a new popularity amongst lenders and borrowers alike. When a borrower signs a deed conveying the property encumbered by a mortgage to the lender rather than go through the foreclosure process, this is called a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. A deed-in-lieu of foreclosure may be taken by a lender in conjunction with a loan workout of residential, commercial or agricultural properties. It is often given as part of a bankruptcy workout or in the case of a prepackaged bankruptcy plan. Most lenders will not accept a deed-in-lieu unless an appraisal on the property reveals that there is no equity in the property and if there are no other liens. In most cases the lender will leave the mortgage of record until the property has been resold to a new purchaser. This allows the lender to maintain priority over subordinate liens and provides a safety net to foreclose the mortgage in the event that the conveyance is set aside as being fraudulent by other creditors or as a preferential-transfer action by a trustee in bankruptcy. Most savvy lenders require a settlement agreement, the deed to contain non-merger language and that the note not be canceled and in return merely agree not to sue under the note. The concern is that the deed-in-lieu may be determined to constitute an equitable mortgage and could be set aside or subordinated to the claims of other creditors. As such, most lenders require a new title policy to be issued at the time of the execution of the deed-in-lieu and that the new policy contain a non-merger endorsement. Another concern in the acceptance of a deed-in-lieu is the possible violation of the "clogging the equity" doctrine, i.e., the use of said deed as a means of preventing the borrower from exercising its statutory and/or equitable rights to redeem the property from a foreclosure sale. Recharacterization and "clogging" issues are compounded if the borrower retains any rights in the property such as a rental agreement or an option to repurchase the property. Title companies generally will not insure a deed-in-lieu if the borrower retains any such rights. Most importantly, if and when a lender or borrower finds it beneficial to both parties to engage in a deed-in-lieu transaction, care should be taken to consult a title company with experience and knowledge of the issues at hand. Nan Gill is the president of Gill Abstract, Goshen, N.Y. and New York, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.