News: Brokerage

Cushman & Wakefield report highlights divide in downtown Manhattan office market as Class A pulls further ahead on rents

Manhattan, NY Cushman & Wakefield released a new research report highlighting a growing divide in downtown Manhattan’s office market, where demand for top-tier, amenitized buildings is driving an increasingly pronounced gap in both performance and pricing across asset classes.

According to the report, since 2020, 73% of the downtown leasing activity was concentrated among Class A buildings, with Class B and lower-tier assets experiencing declining demand, longer marketing periods and reduced tour activity, underscoring a clear and sustained flight-to-quality trend. This is fueled by tenants that are seeking modern office environments with hospitality-driven amenities and thoughtfully curated retail offerings.

For Class A space downtown, the rent premium over Class B space was 25.5% as of Q1 2026 – this marks a more than 11% increase in the asking rent gap between the asset classes since mid-2024. This comes on the heels of strong Q1 for the downtown market, which recorded 2.9 million s/f of leasing activity, the second-highest quarterly total on record, and a $0.44 per s/f increase in rents, which averaged $56.67 for all asset classes in Q1. Class A rents rose by $0.54 per s/f to $61.77.

“Downtown’s office market is continuing to evolve into a distinctly bifurcated landscape, where the highest-quality assets are capturing the overwhelming share of demand and pricing power,” said Maddie Askeland, data specialist at Cushman & Wakefield. “What’s notable is that this divide is no longer just about the building quality or the amenity offerings, it is increasingly evident in the rent gap, which we expect will continue to widen as the year progresses.”

Jared Lewis, senior research analyst at Cushman & Wakefield,said, “As tenants prioritize quality, experience and long-term workplace strategy, the divergence between top-tier and lower-tier assets is expected to accelerate. Without significant reinvestment, repositioning, or conversion, older buildings will likely face continued downward pressure on rents, further reinforcing long-term value disparities across Downtown Manhattan’s office market.”

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,