News: Spotlight Content

Cost segregation studies hold the key to year-end tax savings: Do not miss this boat!

You recently purchased, constructed or inherited a property and now it's time to allocate the purchase price, cost or inherited basis between land and building. Once satisfied with this allocation, you depreciate the building over 39 years (27.5 years for residential property), the IRS required tax life. That's not, however, the end of the story. Did you know that you may be giving up as much as 5% or more of the total cost of your building in lost tax benefits? Isn't taking advantage of the non-cash depreciation deductions one of the reasons you invest in real estate? If you are wondering, as most real estate investors are, how to maximize tax benefits and deductions, read on. A cost segregation study (CSS) can provide property owners and tenants with significant fit-up costs, the benefit of shifting certain property costs from a 39-year life to 15-year, seven-year, and even five-year lives. Items such as landscaping, site fencing, parking lots, floor covering, wall covering, window treatment, process electrical, process plumbing and decorative millwork are just a few examples of costs that fall into shorter lived asset classes. Performing a CSS to accelerate depreciation can lead to significant tax savings and increased cash flow, and can be a terrific component of any year-end tax plan. While this concept may seem straightforward and simple, it takes a trained team of professionals to properly prepare a CSS in accordance with published IRS guidance. A trained tax professional identifies the specific components that will qualify as shorter lived assets while a trained engineering professional performs the detailed cost allocations. The tax professional also needs to know the "rules of the road" when it comes to what the IRS expects to see in a quality CSS report. A CSS is not for everyone, but if you can answer "yes" to the following questions you may be a prime candidate for one: 1. Can you benefit from accelerating depreciation deductions? 2. Do you expect to hold the property for at least two or three years? 3. Is the cost of the property at least $1.5 million? One actual example of the impact of a CSS involves a shopping center, which was acquired in mid-2006 for $10.5 million, excluding the land component. As originally calculated, depreciation expenses for the years 2006 to 2011 were approximately $1.45 million. As a result of a cost segregation study performed in 2006, the company was able to increase its depreciation deduction over the same period by more than $1.25 million. This results in tax savings and additional cash flow of over $525,000 for that six-year period. Savings of this magnitude are very common. A CSS can be performed even after the tax year has ended as long as the results of the study are included in the current year's tax return. Taxpayers can benefit from a CSS not only on a property they have recently purchased, constructed or inherited, but for properties they have owned for many years. Current IRS rules allow the catch-up of missed depreciation deductions on properties acquired many years ago by filing an automatic change in accounting form with their current year's tax return. The missed deductions from the prior years are all caught up and deducted in the current year. No amended returns are required to obtain this extraordinary benefit. Studies have been effectively performed for a multitude of properties, including apartment buildings, office buildings, manufacturing facilities, restaurants, hotels, shopping centers, medical facilities, and many more. As a result, many taxpayers make CSS a regular part of their property purchasing process, and attorneys regularly advise clients who inherit property to inquire about their qualifications for a study. The savings derived from these studies flow right to the bottom line in tax savings and cash flow. The time to act is now. Do not miss this boat! David Grant, CPA, is a partner at J.H. Cohn LLP and the national director of J.H. Cohn's Cost Segregation Study Practice, Roseland, N.J.
MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability