News: Spotlight Content

Air-Blown fiber optics for the campus network provide financial and logistical benefits

Since the 1990s, optical fiber has been the preferred method for interconnecting data networks in the corporate or university campus setting. Installing long-length horizontal stretches of fiber optics through a conduit system involves planning, permits, and coordination with municipalities, utility companies, and public safety agencies. To avoid the expense of additional trench digging due to future increases in demand for bandwidth, cable plans frequently call for additional stretches of unused or "dark fiber," which can be "lit" when it is needed. Predicting the Future Future-proofing the network by installing additional fiber optics may be a solution. But it is difficult to predict exact bandwidth requirements years out, especially during a time when more voice, data, and video applications are rapidly being added to the IP network. There are two major financial risks associated with running additional stretches of fiber optics to insure against future requirements. Installing too much fiber will result in wasted dollars for a product that will never be used, and installing too few fibers will lead to expensive retrenching and installation costs. Air-Blown fiber technology such as FutureFLEX by Sumitomo, offers the ability to properly scale a campus fiber optic infrastructure immediately, while preserving a pathway for future changes and upgrades. By providing a "fiber on demand" technology, network moves, adds, or changes can be made at a fraction of the labor cost of trenching and pulling traditional fiber optic cable. How Air-Blown Fiber Works Instead of traditional innerduct, conduit, and pull boxes, Air-Blown fiber runs through a "tube cable." The tube cable contains up to 19 individually numbered tube cells, inside an outer jacket. The tube cables come in different versions, designed to meet specific environmental requirements. True to its name, bundles of Air-Blown fiber are blown through the tubes with compressed air or nitrogen rather than being pulled. At speeds of 100 to 150 feet per minute, 3,000 feet of fiber can be blown through a tube by two installers in 20 to 30 minutes. Using conventional methods, it would take 4 installers a full 8 hour day to pull the same 3,000 feet of fiber optic cable through a conduit or innerduct. This translates to significant savings in labor costs and minimal business disruptions when changes or additions to the campus fiber infrastructure are needed.1 A Sustainable Pathway to Network Expansion Unlike conventional fiber optic cable, fiber bundles can be blown out of their tubes without being damaged. These fibers can be reused within a network, providing for a renewable and sustainable network infrastructure. Because construction work is not needed to add to or reconfigure the fiber network, disruptions to the workplace due to environmental hazards and debris are eliminated.1 Air-Blown fiber applications are not limited to horizontal campus type environments. Tube cables are also designed for general purpose, plenum, and riser environments. These designs allow those with vertical infrastructure requirements such as high-rise office buildings, hotels, and hospitals to capitalize on the financial and logistical benefits of Air-Blown fiber. 1. Sumitomo Electric Lightwave Michael Hoernecke is executive vice president of BBH Solutions Inc., New York, N.Y.
MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability