News: Spotlight Content

2024 Year in Review: Maxwell Dowd, Cook Properties

Maxwell Dowd
Director of Acquisitions
Cook Properties

What noteworthy transactions or deals from this year best exemplified key market trends or shifts? 

Although CRE transaction volume declined by nearly 10% compared to last year, institutional-quality, well-located assets continued to trade favorably. Notably, KKR acquired a $2 billion multifamily portfolio at a reported 4% cap rate, while Crow Holdings purchased a portfolio of approximately 10,000 manufactured housing sites valued at over $500 million. Both deals highlight a key trend: the strong demand for residential rental real estate in high-growth markets.

What was your greatest professional accomplishment or most notable project, deal, or transaction in 2024?

Interestingly, our greatest achievement in 2024 wasn’t a new acquisition or a completed development project, but successfully executing a series of refinances. The challenging interest rate environment presented significant obstacles for CRE sponsors and investors facing looming maturities. However, despite the volatility in the lending landscape, our team adeptly navigated these challenges, refinancing multiple properties and securing long-term fixed-rate debt. 

What emerging trends will drive investment and development in 2025? 

With the Fed’s interest rate cuts and a shift toward a less-regulated political environment, CRE investment and development are likely to pick up. However, until bid-ask spreads adjust to align with the new realities of higher debt costs, well-capitalized players will likely focus on expanding their development pipelines. Particularly in a market like Upstate New York, where housing demand continues to outpace supply, the lack of new inventory leads to lower vacancy rates and increased rent pressures. To help alleviate this strain, we are focused on developing new residential housing, including apartments, single-family homes, and manufactured housing.

MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.