News: Spotlight Content

2019 Women in Building Services: Jennifer Carey. JLC Environmental Consultants

Name: Jennifer Carey

Title: CEO

Company Name: JLC Environmental Consultants

How many years have you been in your current field? 31

List up to three CRE organizations that you are currently a member of: 

  • CREW New York, 
  • Women Builders Council, 
  • Professional Women in Construction

What was your greatest professional achievement or most notable project in the last 12 months? 

JLC was chosen as the environmental consultant for a large commercial office building restacking project for a prominent entertainment company. This project had several challenges, but the biggest challenge of all involved working successfully with worried employees of the company. Our goal was to a ensure safe work environment for those working near or affected by the construction. One of our objectives was to monitor and minimize pollutant emissions from entering occupied staff areas. This required dealing with the unionized work force and reps from OSHA and other governmental agencies. This type of project highlights the importance of developing strong communication channels among the various parties on a project from the director of real estate on the west coast to the union workforce to the facilities director. It was crucial for the client to, “report the news, not be the news.”

What trend(s) do you predict to dominate your industry in 2019?

Industrial properties are still very much in demand and the clean up and reuse of these and other brownfields sites are important. Opportunity zones are also very hot right now as an investment vechicle - especially since over ½ of the sites chosen to be OZ’s in NY state are in and around the NYC area.

Which of your philanthropic endeavors are you most proud of?

As a past chair of the CREW Network Foundation, which supports scholarships for deserving students who are in a real estate related field of study. I loved giving back to the industry and to the young people who are the future of our industry

MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.