News: Brokerage

When does a closing occur in a 1031 exchange

Given that all replacement property must be acquired within a maximum 180 calendar day period to complete a successful 1031 exchange, determining when a transaction has actually closed is critical to a successful transaction. There are many instances when a careful review of the facts and circumstances as well as state law may be necessary to determine when a transaction has closed and thus whether the closing occurred within the requisite 1031 exchange period. This need for review of such facts may arise where closing documents have been signed within the exchange period but the funds being transferred to the seller delayed until after the expiration of the exchange period. The question may also arise where the buyer has acquired possession of the property prior to the expiration of the exchange period and all prorations have occurred as of the date of possession but for some reason the deed is not recorded and/or delivered until after such time. A determination of when a closing occurs for tax purposes involves the consideration of several factors, including, but not limited to the date of transfer of title. White, Powell, 1970, TC Memo 1970-132, PH TCM, 70132, 29 CCH TCM 588. There is substantial authority for the fact that a sale may occur although title has not been transferred to the buyer where possession and the benefits and burdens of ownership of the property have been transferred to the buyer. Carrie, (1953) PH TCM ¶53366 , 12 CCH TCM 1315; Clodfelter, Floyd v. Com., (1970, CA9) 25 AFTR 2d 70-1254, 426 F2d 1391, 70-1 USTC 9413, affd 1967) 48 TC 694 . Whether a closing has occurred may require a determination of the party responsible for the risk of loss of the property, real estate and other taxes, utility bills and governmental assessments and the party with the right to the income from the property. The date on which prorations occur as indicated by a closing or settlement statement may substantiate the date on which the benefits and burdens of ownership have been transferred to the buyer. Although a closing may occur when title is transferred from a seller to a buyer, this is not always the case. A closing may occur when the buyer obtains possession of the property even though title has not transferred under certain circumstances. For tax purposes, a closing occurs when title is transferred from the seller to the buyer or the buyer obtains possession of the property and the buyer acquires the benefits and burdens of ownership. Thus, in many cases, it is critical to determine when the benefits and burdens of ownership are transferred to the buyer. It should be noted that when the purchase price is paid to the seller is not necessarily determinative. Even where the proceeds have been delivered, if the seller has no power to transfer title and neither title nor the benefits and burdens of ownership or possession of the property are transferred to the buyer, the mere payment of the purchase price will not result in a closing. Thornton, William, (1989) TC Memo 1989-214. For a discussion regarding rulings in this area, please see the continuation of this article appearing in next month's publication. Pamela Michaels is an attorney and a vice president of Asset Preservation, Inc., Manhattan, N.Y.
MORE FROM Brokerage

REALM, DelShah Capital and A.M. Properties acquire 377,000 s/f CitySpire office condominium

Manhattan, NY REALM, in partnership with DelShah Capital and A.M. Properties, acquired  CitySpire, a 377,000 s/f office condominium comprising 24 floors within the 70-story tower at 156 W 56th St. in Midtown. Adjacent to Central Park with transit access and amenities, CitySpire is a Class A office asset located in one of the city’s most sought-after office corridors.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking