News: Brokerage

The Law of Merger

Take caution when purchasing a vacant parcel of land or purchasing a parcel adjacent to one already owned, as the possibility of the merger of lots is a real danger. The doctrine of "merger" involves adjacent lots, which do not conform to the lot area or lot width requirements of the zoning code and which are held in common ownership, merging to become one zoning lot. Often this happens unbeknownst to the owner, and may not be discovered until after one of the lots is conveyed to a third party, resulting in an illegal subdivision. Correcting this problem can be complex, and in some cases impossible, and may involve the necessity of zoning variances, or even unwinding the transaction, both of which will require the cooperation of the other property owner, which may not be forthcoming. In New York, many municipalities have adopted zoning provisions which provide that adjacent nonconforming lots held in common ownership must be treated as a single lot for zoning purposes. When buying in these jurisdictions, a title search should be conducted to investigate the ownership, past and present, of adjacent parcels, to ensure that no merger has occurred. It is crucial that title to adjacent lots be held in different names at all times to prevent a merger from occurring. Even if the lots are currently conforming, if the regulations are changed and the lots are rendered substandard in any way, those lots will be deemed merged. If, however, a code change renders two adjoining, but separately-owned, lots undersized, the two properties will not be affected. Each lot will continue to be lawful, non-conforming lots. It is essential that experienced zoning counsel be consulted on the purchase of vacant or adjacent lots to ensure that an unwanted merger has not already occurred and will not be likely to occur. Kathleen Deegan Dickson, Esq. is a partner at Forchelli, Curto, Deegan, Schwartz, Mineo & Terrana, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,