News: Brokerage

The Internal Revenue Service simplifies available relief for real estate professionals

For individuals with investments in real estate, qualification as a real estate professional can result in favorable tax consequences. While losses from real estate activities are passive per se, the losses of a real estate professional are considered ordinary losses available to offset other ordinary income. In order to qualify as a real estate professional, a taxpayer must pass both tests of Internal Revenue Code Section 469(c)(7)(B). First, more than one half of the overall personal service hours performed by the taxpayer in the tax year must be performed in real estate trades or businesses in which the taxpayer materially participates. Second, the taxpayer must perform at least 750 hours in real estate trades or businesses in which that taxpayer materially participates. For purposes of the second test, the IRS looks at each real estate activity separately. A taxpayer would only qualify as a real estate professional for real estate activities in which they perform more than 750 hours during the tax year. A solution for a taxpayer trying to qualify as a real estate professional lies in a special election available to taxpayers under Regulation Section 1.469-9(g). This regulation allows a taxpayer to aggregate all real estate activities into one activity. After aggregation, a taxpayer must perform 750 hours across the grouped activities. This election may be made in any year in which the taxpayer qualifies as a real estate professional and must be made on an originally filed tax return. If this election is not timely filed, a taxpayer must request a ruling for late relief under §301.9100-3 and pay a user fee. Revenue Procedure 2011-34, issued in May 2011, simplifies the process of requesting late relief to file a §1.469-9(g) election and allows qualifying taxpayers to retroactively aggregate real estate activities. In order to qualify under Rev. Proc. 2011-34, a taxpayer must meet the following requirements: * The taxpayer failed to make an election under §1.469-9(g) solely because the taxpayer failed to timely meet the requirements in §1.469-9(g); * The taxpayer filed consistently with having made a timely election under §1.469-9(g) on any return that would have been affected if the taxpayer had timely made the election; * The taxpayer has timely filed each return that would have been affected by a timely filed election; and * The taxpayer has reasonable cause for its failure to timely meet the requirements of §1.469-9(g). Taxpayers who meet these requirements may attach the statement required by §1.469-9(g) to an amended return for the most recent tax year. The statement must contain all of the information required under §1.469-9(g) and must explain the reason for the failure to file a timely election. Last, the statement should identify the taxable year for which it seeks to make the late election. Since the election required by §1.469-9(g) is the difference for many taxpayers between qualifying and not qualifying as a real estate professional, the late election relief provided by Rev. Proc. 2011-34 is a welcome opportunity. Taxpayers requiring late relief for failure to timely file the §1.469-9(g) election should capitalize on the chance to make the election retroactively without the cost and burden of a ruling request. Brian Lovett, CPA, JD, is a senior tax manager at WithumSmith + Brown, PC, New York, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,