News: Brokerage

Rosenberg & Estis, P.C. facilitates $89m NYC Accelerator C-PACE loan

Manhattan, NY Rosenberg & Estis, P.C. facilitated an $89 million NYC Accelerator Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) loan to help Nightingale Properties and Wafra Capital Partners retrofit 111 Wall St. to be energy efficient.

It’s one of the largest C-PACE funding transactions in U.S. history and one of the first in the city since the state Legislature established the funding structure in New York in 2009. Michael Lefkowitz, managing member, and Stefanie Graham, of counsel, with Rosenberg & Estis, P.C., both members of the firm’s Transactional Department, facilitated the deal on behalf of the property’s new owners.

The loan, which will fund energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements for more than 900,000 s/f of offices at the former Citibank building, will be repaid via an annual property tax assessment. The funding will help the building comply with the stringent carbon-cutting requirements in New York City’s Local Law 97, one of 10 bills in the city’s sweeping 2019 Climate Mobilization Act.

The improvements are expected to save $2.5 million in annual energy costs and help the building’s owners avoid $750,000 per year in LL97 fines alone, beginning in 2030, according to NYC mayor Bill de Blasio’s office. LL97 requires over 50,000 of the city’s largest buildings to reduce carbon emissions by 40% by 2030 (and by 80% by 2050). New York’s Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act, also passed in 2019, adds its own energy efficiency benchmarks.

“Rosenberg & Estis is proud to have made history by facilitating the largest C-PACE loan in U.S. history and the first such deal in New York City,” said Lefkowitz. “This difference-making deal will help a landmark building in the heart of New York City’s financial district operate more cleanly and efficiently. It sets a precedent for other building owners in America’s biggest city to fund the improvements required to comply with LL97.”

“This is only the beginning of a growing trend for property owners, who will gravitate to this financing as a way to operate more cleanly and efficiently,” Graham said. “This is a powerful tool that is made on more attractive terms than traditional mezzanine debt.”

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,