News: Brokerage

Pen to paper: The persistence of wet ink signatures in real estate transactions - by Lindsay Mesh Lotito

Lindsay Mesh-Lotito

While in many circumstances electronically signing documents is easier for all parties involved, for commercial loans and real estate transactions, wet ink original signatures are still required.

New York State passed legislation in 2021, the Electronic Signatures and Records Act (ERSA) Regulation, permitting and establishing the standards and procedures for use and authentication of electronic signatures and records. ERSA also added Section 291-i to the Real Property Law, permitting recording officers to electronically record documents affecting real property. While ERSA has authorized this statewide, in practice, some counties do permit documents to be recorded and filed electronically, but the recording officer is still required to have an original, wet ink signature in hand.

None of the 62 counties in New York State have yet to accept electronic signatures for the recording of real property documents (mortgages, deeds, etc.) without a wet signature in hand. As such, it is still required that all documents that are to be recorded be wet ink signed. It is then the best practice to have any document which acts as the security for a loan be an original signature as well as the note for such loan.

In addition to the recording issues, if it ever was to be litigated as to the validity of the document and signature on same, both sides would need to prove “who signed what” and the party accused of providing a false signature would also need to prove the authentication and identification processes used for each electronic signature and the document security (the audit trail with timestamps of altering, viewing and signing the document).

While not always the most convenient, at the bare minimum, deeds, notes, mortgages and security agreements should not be electronically signed and wet ink original documents need to be provided to the recording officers.

Lindsay Mesh Lotito is a partner and a member of the firm’s real estate and banking & finance practice groups at Forchelli Deegan Terrana LLP, Uniondale, NY.

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,