News: Brokerage

New York City development tools: Mandatory Inclusionary Housing - Part 4 - by Michael Smith and Patrick O’Sullivan

Michael Smith

 

Patrick O’Sullivan

 

Part 3 of this four-part series appeared in the February 2nd edition.

The Mandatory Inclusionary Housing (MIH) program allows developers to utilize increased development rights allowed under a rezoning by creating permanently affordable housing marketable to both renters and purchasers in New York City. In 2016, following a citywide rezoning effort, mayor Bill de Blasio and the City’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) launched the program. MIH allows the city to promote the creation of affordable housing through rezoning efforts.

The MIH program is available to sites zoned as an area designated for MIH (MIH Area). MIH Areas are located throughout the city (mainly in the Bronx, Brooklyn and Queens), and identified in Appendix F of the city’s Zoning Resolution. A site can become an MIH Area either through a neighborhood-wide rezoning or an individual property up-zoning where the city determines that the site is an MIH Area. While many proposed neighborhood-wide rezonings would become MIH Areas—such as in the case of the contemplated Gowanus rezoning—HPD will not accept an MIH application for a site until the rezoning is approved.

Compliance with the MIH affordability requirements is triggered for projects in an MIH Area that exceed (x) 10 residential units or (y) 12,500 s/f of residential floor area. In such cases, a percentage of residential units must be permanently affordable depending on which HPD affordability option the developer chooses:

  • Option 1: 25% of units permanently affordable at 60% of average monthly income (AMI) with a minimum of 10% affordable at 40% of AMI;
  • Option 2: 30% of units permanently affordable at 80% of AMI;
  • Option 3: a/k/a the “Deep Affordability Option”: 20% of units permanently affordable at an average of 40% of AMI; and
  • Option 4: a/k/a the “Workforce Option”: 30% of units permanently affordable at 115% of AMI with a minimum of 5% of units at 70% of AMI and 5% of units at 90% of AMI

Small developments that have fewer than 25 residential units and that are under 25,000 residential s/f can pay into a city affordable housing fund in lieu of constructing affordable units. In addition, developments required to construct affordable units can seek to modify the affordable housing requirement through a special permit from the city’s Board of Standards and Appeals.

MIH applicants work with HPD, which administers the MIH Program, and collaboration with HPD is critical to a successful application. The MIH application process is multi-disciplinary and involves various professionals, from attorneys to architects. To begin the process with HPD, an MIH applicant will need to submit an inclusionary housing application along with architectural plans and stacking charts and disclosure forms for the applicant, the project’s general contractor and administering agent. The applicant will also need to provide financing information regarding the project, including an executed term sheet, underwriting and commitment letter. In addition, the MIH applicant will need to deliver notice to the applicable community board at least 45 days prior to the expected closing date. The application process parallels that of HPD’s Voluntary Inclusionary Housing (VIH) program, which has been around since 1987.

When an application is approved, the applicant and HPD will negotiate a restrictive declaration to be recorded on the property to evidence the affordable housing requirement. HPD and the applicant will also negotiate a subordination and non-disturbance agreement. The applicant’s counsel will need to provide an opinion in connection with the restrictive declaration.

MIH is still a developing program. Should you have a project in mind, we would be pleased to discuss the MIH program.

Michael Smith and Patrick O’Sullivan, Jr. are partners at Herrick, Feinstein, New York, N.Y. Wylie Rechler of Herrick, Feinstein contributed to this article.

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.