News: Brokerage

Countering a mechanic's lien filed against real property

The filing of a mechanic's lien against real property need not necessarily be cause for alarm. While a lien has the potential to cause severe hardships on a project, its effect can usually be minimized through the use of some of the tools provided in the New York Lien Law. One of those tools, set forth in Lien Law §59, permits the property owner or contractor to serve a notice on the lienor demanding that it foreclose on its lien within thirty days. If the lienor fails to timely foreclose, the owner or contractor may seek an order discharging the lien. Sometimes, however, the issue presented is not simply whether the foreclosure action was timely commenced within the statutory period, but rather whether the action was properly commenced at all. In one recent case, a subcontractor filed a mechanic's lien against a commercial building located in Manhattan. The general contractor, believing the subcontractor had failed to properly perform its work, then commenced litigation against the subcontractor in District Court in Nassau County (as the subcontractor's business office was located in Nassau County) and also served a Lien Law §59 demand to foreclose. The lienor subsequently served its answer to the lawsuit in Nassau County and asserted a counterclaim seeking the "establishment" of its mechanic's lien. The general contractor thereafter petitioned the court in New York County (where the lien was filed) to discharge the lien for failure to commence a foreclosure action as required. The general contractor argued that the counterclaim raised in the Nassau County action did not constitute a proper foreclosure action as the property owner (who, unless the lien has been discharged by bond, is a necessary party to a foreclosure action) was not named in the action and since the District Court, a court of limited jurisdiction, does not have jurisdiction over a foreclosure action. The New York County court granted the petition and discharged the mechanic's lien. Joseph Asselta is a partner at Forchelli, Curto, Deegan, Schwartz, Mineo & Terrana, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking