News: Brokerage

Construction Law: The difference between private and public mechanic's liens

Mechanic's liens are creatures of statute. They can be for private or public work projects. Private liens are basically a form of legal notice that is placed on the title to the real property, showing that contractors, subcontractors, suppliers or architects claim they are owed money. Mechanic's liens on public projects are very different, since they are against the money owed by the public agency to the contractor. When most people think about mechanic's liens for unpaid work by a contractor, they think of private mechanic's liens. They can be on residential or commercial property. When they are filed in connection with renovation on a shareholder's apartment, they are filed against the entire building because the shareholder only owns shares in the co-op corporation. This is why co-ops require shareholders in their Alteration Agreements to have liens removed or the co-op will do it and charge them back for the expenses. They can be filed on condominium buildings or on individual units. Sometimes they are incorrectly filed against the entire condominium building, when they should only have been filed against only one unit. The ultimate goal is to sell the real property to obtain the money owed in the lien. However, merely filing a private lien does not get the contractor paid or mean that the owner is going to lose his property in a foreclosure sale. If the lien is for a dollar amount where the owner has the financial ability to bond it or deposit the money with the court, it will take a great deal of the pressure off of the owner. The lien becomes a civil fee dispute and no longer involves the real property. Like private liens, public liens can be bonded, so that the lien will just involve a dispute over the money owed. C. Jaye Berger, Esq., is the principal of Law Offices C. Jaye Berger, New York, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking