News: Brokerage

A primer on minor subdivisions in Nassau County

The Nassau County Charter defines a minor subdivision as "any proposed subdivision resulting in fewer than five lots." In most cases, a two to four lot subdivision will be considered minor unless the project involves a new public road or public improvement or there are environmental considerations that must be examined to determine the impact on the community. As a practical matter, the major difference between minor and major subdivisions is the level of county review. Minor subdivisions are reviewed internally by Nassau County Planning Commission (Commission) staff and are not subject to the review and approval of the Nassau County Department of Health and Department of Public Works. The other major distinction is that a map filing with the county clerk is not required under Real Property Law 334-a. Applicants that receive minor subdivision approval from the commission simply record deeds in the Nassau County clerk's office within one year of approval to complete the process and to create the new lots. Moreover, pursuant to Nassau County Charter §1610(b), the commission has jurisdiction over "all portions of the county outside of cities and villages or within a city or village and within three hundred feet of the boundary of such cities and villages." In plain English, if the property you are subdividing is wholly within the municipal boundaries of a town, then the commission has jurisdiction over the application. If the property is wholly within an incorporated village or city, then that village or city has jurisdiction. If, however, the property is also within three hundred feet of another municipal boundary, then the commission and the other municipalities have jurisdiction over the application. All subdivisions applications in Nassau County require an extensive zoning analysis to determine the legal status of the premises, the character of the neighborhood and the parameters of development. Andrea Tsoukalas, Esq. is a partner at Forchelli, Curto, Deegan, Schwartz, Mineo & Terrana, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced