News: Brokerage

Why Long Island City’s “LIC One” Rezoning Could Hurt Property Values for Some Owners - by Cole Kinney Leonhardt

Cole Kinney Leonhardt

The recent "One LIC" rezoning proposal—a sweeping land-use change aimed at boosting housing production in Long Island City—has sparked growing concern among property owners, as all upzoned sites will be subject to Mandatory Inclusionary Housing (MIH). While the initiative is framed as a tool for affordability and growth, its implementation could depress property values for many private owners caught in the rezoning footprint.

The Core Issue: MIH's Burden on Value

Under MIH, developers must set aside a portion (typically 20–30%) of residential units as permanently affordable, often at below-market rents. While this policy aims to expand housing access, it also significantly reduces the revenue potential of a development—a critical factor in how land is valued.

For small and mid-sized property owners who might have sold to a developer, this affordability mandate can shrink what buyers are willing to pay, especially when combined with heightened interest rates and rising construction costs.

Just as importantly, MIH prevents developers from building high-end, luxury condo projects—a product type that often justifies premium land prices in upzoned areas like Long Island City. Without the ability to pursue luxury condo strategies, developers lose a key path to maximizing return on investment, making many MIH-designated sites far less attractive.

Loss of Market Flexibility

Unlike voluntary inclusionary zoning, MIH is mandatory and binding—there’s no opt-out. This rigidity means that even if the economics don't work, developers still must comply. As a result, many owners of newly upzoned sites find themselves with “paper density” (more allowable height or FAR), but lower real-world value because the mandated affordability erodes profit margins.

Uneven Impact Across LIC

The proposed rezoning affects a broad swath of Long Island City, but the impact won’t be uniform. Commercial or industrial-zoned sites may benefit from more zoning flexibility, opening the door to residential development where it was previously restricted. However, existing residentially zoned sites—particularly those that could have been marketed for luxury condo development—will see no added flexibility under the new framework.

Instead, these sites will now be subject to Mandatory Inclusionary Housing (MIH), forcing developers to include affordable units and making luxury condo development financially unfeasible. As a result, owners of these properties may find themselves locked into lower land valuations, with the only viable buyers being those pursuing MIH rental projects with thinner margins. In many cases, what appears to be an upzoning may actually erode value by removing optionality and narrowing the buyer pool.

The Takeaway

While well-intentioned, the “One LIC” rezoning plan risks unintended consequences: by applying MIH mandates broadly, it may devalue private property, reduce site liquidity, and chill interest from potential buyers and developers. Owners should stay informed, speak with planners, and consider advocacy—because not all “upzoning” leads to upside.

Cole Kinney Leonhardt, Investment Sales Associate, Brax Realty, New York, New York

READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking