News: Brokerage

Founders Message: Casinos

A few years ago I wrote a message about the positive values of casinos. If you've ever been to one you know that they are very clean, entertaining, and people dress up, spend money and have fun. In the 1930s Nevada legalized gambling, and for many many years had no state tax or real estate taxes. Smart move by them. And if you ever visited Las Vegas you would have found a very clean and entertaining city. Crime? Probably a lot less than most cities. Today the biggest gambling activity in the country is the lotteries. States make a lot of money on the lotteries and don't have to build special buildings where people can gamble. Over the past twenty or so years many race tracks have been losing attendance because of a lot of reasons - none of them really negative. Remember, horseracing is the sport of kings. Many race tracks around the country were allowed to install slot machines and that action turned the business entirely around helping those tracks to not only survive but become what we call racinos. Race tracks employ a lot of people and I don't think this country wants to help put companies like that out of business. That now brings us to Boston and Suffolk Downs, a race track that has been in business since the early thirties. It is located on a MBTA line and a major highway only a few miles from downtown Boston, one of the greatest sports cities in the country. Why didn't they install slot machines ten years ago? Why don't they have a casino there right now? I can't answer, but common sense would say that they should, and we all know that common sense was outlawed many years ago, especially in political circles. Those who fight casinos and gambling are ignorant to the facts. Casinos don't promote more crime, and if you ever attended one you felt very safe just by the way the people dressed. People who vote against casinos are told that gambling is addictive. So is coffee, cigarettes and Pepsi. But more addictive are the lotteries that return very small prizes, and states promote lotteries every day. Catholic churches have been playing bingo for as far back as I recall. Is bingo addictive? The truth is that there is nothing wrong with gambling and nothing wrong with race tracks and nothing wrong with casinos. Probably the best reason for having a casino ten or twenty, or even seventy years ago is that it creates jobs and helps pay a state's bills. The last time I visited Foxwoods in Connecticut I noticed that at least half of the cars in the parking lot had Massachusetts plates. What did that tell me? And hey New Hampshire, what the heck are you doing with once beautiful Rockingham Park? Come on guys, get with the program. If Suffolk Downs doesn't get the OK to build a Casino on their own property, Massachusetts residents should be ashamed of our state leaders. Roland Hopkins is founder of the NYREJ, Norwell, Mass.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

The anticipated effect of Basel III and ISO 20022 implementation on commercial real estate - by Michael Zysman

July 1, 2025 is the deadline for US banks to begin to adopt Basel III banking standards and July 14, 2025 is the deadline for U.S. banks to adopt ISO 20022 messaging standards. Both will have a significant effect on the banking and commercial real estate (CRE) finance sectors.
Tri-state capital  migrates nationally amid  regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

Tri-state capital migrates nationally amid regulation pressure - by Reese Weaver

New York tri-state multifamily investors are increasingly reallocating capital to less-regulated markets across the U.S. as rent control and legislative risk erode returns at home. With over 60% of New York City’s rental housing stock classified as rent-stabilized, the traditional value-add model — buying under-performing buildings,

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

The death of the generic offering memorandum: What buyers expect in 2025 - by Kimberly Zar Bloorian

There was a time when an offering memorandum (OM) was pretty bare bones, some photos, a few bullet points on income, and a rent roll thrown in at the back. That used to get the job done. Not anymore. In 2025, buyers are sharper, faster, and more selective. They’re looking
A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

A fresh start - by Shallini Mehra and Amit Doshi

For the past several years, the New York City multifamily housing market has been defined by disruption. The combined impact of the HSTPA rent laws and a sharply higher interest rate environment has fundamentally reduced