State supreme court justice Robert Sackett ruled that clean-ups under the State Superfund Program need to attain conditions protective of human health and the environment by eliminating the "significant threats," the goal for which the Superfund Coalition had argued, and do not have to go farther to remove every last molecule of the contaminant. The State DEC had sought to interpret the statute as requiring the remediation of sites to the pristine, "pre-disposal" condition they were in before contamination. The court noted that the pre-disposal standard only applied to sites created by recent illegal hazardous waste disposal.
The state's authority in determining parties responsible for these clean-ups was limited to state law. The judge ruled that the state DEC's effort to automatically apply federal law to determine liability on a wholesale basis was not justified.
Thanks for Reading!
You've read 1 of your 3 guest articles
Register and get instant unlimited access to all of our articles online.
Sign up is quick, easy, & FREE.
Subscription Options
Sign up is quick, easy, & FREE.
Already have an account? Login here