News: Spotlight Content

Bellantoni, Petersen and Yunis of RKF act for Nida in 2,100 s/f lease

Robert K. Futterman & Associates (RKF) recently secured a 2,100 s/f space for urban clothier Nida at 571-573 Hudson St., located between West 11th and Bank Sts. in the borough's West Village. Scheduled to open its first New York location this winter, Nida will occupy 1,050 s/f on the ground and 1,050 s/f in the basement. RKF executive vice president Karen Bellantoni and director Caleb Petersen represented the tenant, while executive vice president and principal Amira Yunis and director Jared Lack of Newmark Knight Frank Retail represented the landlord, 571 Hudson Street Corp. "Nida was looking to find an ideal location to serve as its East Coast presence and the West Village was a viable option, with its incredible storefronts and visibility," said Bellantoni. "The pedestrian traffic and nearby food options will help position this brand in a growing retail corridor." Nida is based in San Francisco, California and features a collection of edgy urban clothing, shoes, and accessories with an array of styles for men and women and heavily influenced by European design and workmanship. This boutique store hosts a collection of designer labels and displays and sells neoteric works by local San Francisco artists. The country's leading independent real estate firm specializing in retail leasing, investment sales and consulting services, Robert K. Futterman & Associates (RKF) serves a broad spectrum of domestic and global clients in services ranging from national tenant and owner representation to advisory, consulting and disposition. With more than $9 billion in aggregate real estate transactions to its credit, RKF has been responsible for identifying scores of real estate opportunities throughout the United States for leading American and international chains, retailers, developers and institutional clients. RKF is headquartered in New York with offices in Northern New Jersey, Las Vegas, Los Angeles and San Francisco.
MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.