News: Spotlight Content

2017 Women in Professional Services: Diana Brummer of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP

Diana Brummer,
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP

Name: Diana Brummer

Title: Partner

Company Name: Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP             

Years in real estate: 18 years

What real estate associations or organizations are you a member of? Association of Real Estate Women, Association of the Bar of the City of New York

How have you navigated obstacles to achieve success in your career? The recent recession was a major obstacle for all of us.  By consistently having a willingness to step outside of my comfort zone and put in the time and effort to learn new skills, I have developed an unusually broad legal skill set among real estate attorneys that allowed me to navigate the ever-changing needs of clients during the recession and thereafter.  

How do you play your strengths to your advantage in your career? One of my strengths is maintaining composure during heated negotiations and stressful situations. By avoiding getting emotional or angry, I’m able to focus on the substance of the issues at hand.  As a result, my clients are more comfortable and through our positive working relationship with the “other side” of the table, we are able to come to resolutions that are beneficial to my clients.

What trends are you seeing so far this year? So far in 2017, there has been a bit less deal activity. This is, in part, a result of the strong performance of equity markets and reallocations by institutional investors away from real estate towards equity investments, as well as somewhat decreased interest from foreign investors reflecting the strained foreign relationships during these early days of the Trump administration. However, there seems to be a resurgence of interest in debt funds and a strong mezzanine debt market.

What do you do for fun? As a mom of two boys, I started following basketball in a “if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em” move.  We’re watching a lot of NBA playoff games!

MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.