News: Spotlight Content

New York City unexpectedly slashed assessments, but big increases could be on the horizon - by Peter Blond

While real estate valuation for tax purposes is frequently more art than science, the past six months in New York City have left most valuation and real estate tax professionals perplexed. In January, I opined that a preemptive slashing of 2021/22 New York City tax assessments was unlikely as it would result in billions of lost revenue without a corresponding increase to the tax rates as an offset. It was also prior to the commencement of President Biden’s term and the fate of nationwide municipal economic assistance was thereby unknown. Here we are, though, many months later and the New York City Department of Finance did the unthinkable; assessments were slashed in January for the 2021/22 tax year and the New York City has now announced relatively stable tax rates for 2021/22 as well.

Of course it is impossible to blame the New York City Department of Finance for recognizing many properties were suffering catastrophic losses both in terms of rents collected and occupancy rates due to COVID’s wrath. The New York City assessors lacked sufficient information for each individual property as they only possessed the 2019 financial data via the RPIE. The storefront registry could have helped, but it was brand new and replete with delays and errors. Field inspections, to review new construction, demolitions and the like weren’t performed for many months. In fact, New York City assessors worked from home nearly exclusively from March of 2020 through the spring of 2021.

As a result, year-over-year assessment roll reductions for commercial properties often range to just over 30%. Depending on the borough, many cooperatives and rental apartment buildings received 10% reductions. Mixed-use buildings with at least 11 total units received reductions ranging from 10% to upwards of 30%. For those attentive to the bottom line that necessarily means the city left billions on the table.

Obviously, the Federal Government’s assistance to municipalities have led to some unexpected surpluses, but many arguably questionable if not downright irresponsible fiscal approaches have resulted. Needless to say, unless the local economy and collectable taxes—other than real estate taxes—skyrocket, New York City will require a multi-billion dollar infusion again in 2022 or the city will be facing a massive shortfall. That is unless the city plans on enormous assessment and tax rate hikes in 2022.

Based on the 2020 calendar year performance for many properties, the preemptive reductions granted by the Department of Finance went way too far in a substantial number of instances. In other words, windfalls were provided to many property owners by way of the city’s blindfolded “pin the tail on the donkey” methodology. The multi-billion dollar question at the moment is whether the Department of Finance will revert, more or less, to business as usual for the 2022/23 tax year? A return to a more typical valuation model suggests properties could see 50%+ sized actual assessment increases at a precarious time in the economic recovery. Property owners that fared better than anticipated in 2020 but lost a critical tenant or tenants in early 2021 will be in danger should this approach be taken.

If the Department of Finance decides to err on the side of caution, much like the Fed at the moment, tax rates will have to soar to make-up the taxable assessment shortfall. This approach would further exacerbate the chasm between the winners and losers unintentionally manufactured by the Department of Finance’s across the board valuation model for the 2021/22 tax year. In other words, properties negatively impacted by COVID would likely end up paying a larger percentage of their gross income to New York City real estate taxes than properties that remained essentially unchanged economically. As the assessments for 2022/23 are being promulgated now, with an outgoing mayor and numerous lame duck City Council members, all bets are off with respect to the 2022 roll’s construction. Similarly, there are few leading politicians left to face the music should assessments suddenly leap ahead in January.

With rental activity increasing, many new commercial tenants will have real estate tax overage clauses with a 2021/22 base year. If the building received a dramatic but not wholly called for 2021/22 assessment reduction, the new tenant is likely to be impacted very quickly if assessments reverse course in January. New tenants with overage clauses may be facing very large unexpected additional rent in the second half of 2022 (2022/23 tax year commences July 1st, 2022). With the seemingly never ending stream of variants causing further economic impediments, the recovery for each property is far from certain. In January, it is essential to consult with your certiorari counsel to ascertain whether any increase or decrease is appropriate relative to 2021 performance and occupancy as of January 2022.

Peter Blond, Esq. is a partner at Brandt, Steinberg, Lewis & Blond LLP and the immediate past chair of the NYC Bar committee on condemnation & tax certiorari, New York, N.Y.

MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary