News: Spotlight Content

In this market, no owner or leasing agent can afford to be arrogant or insulting to a tenant

Nothing like an article based on firsthand knowledge. Next week begins month three at my new office. Didn't want to move. But REIT's have away of "inviting" one to move. I was an 11-year tenant. It was at best an A-minus building. The REIT had always acted like they were doing me a favor. Corporate arrogance, I guess. At my last renewal there was a major mess after the lease was renewed. The president of the REIT called me himself to smooth out the mess. The leasing agent obviously has a short memory. And he thinks he was doing me a favor. The building manager and general staff were fabulous, but they didn't handle leasing. I was looking to reduce my office size. No need to pay for unused space. I communicated this to the same leasing person I initially rented the space thru. He knew I was in the "business." His only offer was space at our sister building in the complex. He sent me the diagram. I pointed out his measurements were incorrect. He had redefined the term net usable space. His incorrect definition added 90 s/f. Given the loss factor, the high rent and the many pass alongs, by my calculation that 90 s/f was the equivalent of more than four months rental over five years. I sent him a hyperlink to an industry website defining usable space. His response was "radio silence." How insulting. So I looked. I contacted the broker that assisted a floor mate in his move. It resulted in me renting more space at much less rent. Ok, it is a B building, but as my friend noted, today office visits with clients are rare and clients do appreciate not having their billing rates rise. So I looked at several properties in the area. There are a lot available. Cheaper with owners anxious to rent. They offered concessions and would negotiate. Some buildings included onsite free parking. I'm not the biggest tenant. But vacant space, means zero income. My current lease will gross my landlord well above $100,000. The REIT is receiving nothing for my old space. And even when they find a replacement, they have lost me as a tenant so it's a net loss to them. Not to mention the concessions they will have to give, and the work they will need to do to make a new tenant happy. My current space is two blocks away. I see my old building from my top floor window. I have a new, cleaner, upgraded and brighter space and it's a solid B building. My windows open! Good staff. Family owned. No nonsense owners. Sat down at a face-to-face meeting and ironed out the lease. You know, like the, "good old days." This owner understood "market conditions." The broker took the measurements in front of me and we arrived at an accurate computation of net space available. The final rental, with concessions and work done, made the final decision easy. Albeit I made it in a fetal position. My new office overlooks White Plains. The wiring is upgraded to handle today's Internet and telecommunications needs. My staff, working with the owner's staff made the move smooth. My current LL now has a full floor in its building rented with a five year lease. Oh yes, the old broker did email me, (not a visit or a telephone call!), three weeks before the expiration of my lease, and "invited" me to discuss a renewal. My response pointed out that it was obvious he didn't rent my space, that his invitation was late and I asked him (professionally) if he thought I was that stupid as to not have protected myself. How impersonal. How insulting. Had he acted professionally and not, among other things, redefined common industry terms, I probably would have stayed. Owners know tenants get paralyzed over the thought of moving (see fetal position above). My hand was forced and it turned out it was for the better for my office. I should thank him. I will email him a copy of this article. Probably his boss too. The REIT has an empty suite. It has lost a long-time tenant and will lose others as my old neighbors wait for their leases to expire. It has already lost three month's income. Concessions and work at the suite will cost the REIT at least eight month's rent. Well the arrogance of the REIT and its leasing agent sure has paid off for them. So which kind of owner are you? Which kind of rental agent are you? In this market no owner or leasing agent can afford to be arrogant or insulting to a tenant. No owner can afford any space remanding vacant or becoming vacant. Howard Stern, Esq., is the owner and an attorney at Law Offices of Howard Stern, White Plains, N.Y.
MORE FROM Spotlight Content

Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin

When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Oldies but goodies:  The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra

Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen

The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:

Formal Legislative Role

Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian

In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe

Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.