News:
Spotlight Content
Posted: November 24, 2014
Goldschmidt of Goldschmidt & Associates secures leasing of 5 Westchester CVS locations
Eric Goldschmidt, senior partner of Scarsdale-based Goldschmidt & Associates (G&A) has brokered the leasing of 5 new Westchester CVS locations open or opening in 4th quarter 2014 and 1st quarter 2015.
The new 20,000 s/f CVS in Armonk opened in October, replacing the former A&P. CVS and the property owner improved the entire property with a new drive-thru, parking lot, and modernized building exterior.
In Katonah, CVS purchased the Katonah Pharmacy in The Katonah Shopping Center and plans to open by December 1.
CVS will be opening near December 1, 13,000 s/f in a portion of the former Staples space at 1703 Central Park Ave., just north of Tuckahoe Rd., Yonkers. This will be the second Yonkers store CVS opened on Central Ave. this year having opened a 14,400 s/f store in the former Nathan's location. Representing the 1703 CPA shopping center owner was Nel Rahimzada of Ra-Massi Realty.
Opening in early 2015 will be a 20,000 s/f store on Rt. 119, White Plains formerly occupied by Staples. This will be CVS' second new Rt. 119 location in the past 12 months having recently opened in the former Stop & Shop Center in Tarrytown. The White Plains location is a block away from the Westchester County Center and the northern intersection with Central Park Ave.
Also opening in early 2015 will be a new freestanding 14,000 s/f store in the Chilmark Shopping Center, Briarcliff Manor. This major local center is co-anchored with The Food Emporium.
Goldschmidt and Associates worked in conjunction with T.M. Crowley & Associates.
T.M. Crowley & Associates is one of the nation's largest and most experienced developers, having served as the third party developer for more than 500 CVS stores throughout the United States. With more than 20 years of experience working with CVS, T.M. Crowley & Associates provides a single point of accountability, centralizing CVS' real estate objectives, strategies and responsibilities for the markets they serve.
CVS' expansion in the Hudson Valley is continuing as it is currently seeking sites in Westchester, Putnam, Dutchess, and Orange Counties. The preference is to purchase development sites or existing buildings but CVS will be open to any good opportunities.
Tags:
Spotlight Content
MORE FROM Spotlight Content
Over half of Long Island towns vote to exceed the tax cap - Here’s how owners can respond - by Brad and Sean Cronin
When New York permanently adopted the 2% property tax cap more than a decade ago, many owners hoped it would finally end the relentless climb in tax bills. But in the last couple of years, that “cap” has started to look more like a speed bump. Property owners are seeing taxes increase even when an
.png)
Quick Hits
.jpg)
Columns and Thought Leadership
Oldies but goodies: The value of long-term ownership in rent-stabilized assets - by Shallini Mehra
Active investors seeking rent-stabilized properties often gravitate toward buildings that have been held under long-term ownership — and for good reasons. These properties tend to be well-maintained, both physically and operationally, offering a level of stability
How much power does the NYC mayor really have over real estate policy? - by Ron Cohen
The mayor of New York City holds significant influence over real estate policy — but not absolute legislative power. Here’s how it breaks down:
Formal Legislative Role
• Limited direct lawmaking power: The NYC Council is the primary
The strategy of co-op busting in commercial real estate - by Robert Khodadadian
In New York City’s competitive real estate market, particularly in prime neighborhoods like Midtown Manhattan, investors are constantly seeking new ways to unlock property value. One such strategy — often overlooked but
Properly serving a lien law Section 59 Demand - by Bret McCabe
Many attorneys operating within the construction space are familiar with the provisions of New York Lien Law, which allow for the discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien in the event the lienor does not commence an action to enforce following the service of a “Section 59 Demand”.
.gif)